Critical Evaluation
The Brothers is one of Terence’s most popular comedies, probably because it approaches in such a good-humored manner a subject that affects every member of a family. Responsible parents worry about the best way to bring up their children, and their offspring worry about how to live up to their parents’ expectations.
Although both fathers love the young men for whom they are responsible, Demea and Micio could hardly differ more in their philosophies of child rearing. Demea believes in governing by fear, and Micio believes in governing by love. Ctesipho, raised by Demea’s strict rules, was made to work hard, and, at least in his father’s opinion, was kept away from temptation; Aeschinus, raised by Micio, was allowed total freedom, excused for his misdeeds, and easily forgiven.
As Micio explains his ideas in his opening monologue, his ideas seem extremely appealing, while Demea’s ideas seem old-fashioned and unenlightened. By appearing to side with Micio, however, Terence is placing his audience off guard. In fact, neither brother has a foolproof solution to the problem of raising and educating the young. As the story progresses, it becomes evident how little the two fathers really know about their sons and how easily the fathers can be deceived.
When Terence looks at the outcomes of these two educational experiments, the young men have entered a critical time in their lives. They are old enough to get into serious trouble, but they are too young to govern their actions by reason. Each has become involved with a woman, and, as the customs of comedy dictate, these relationships have been concealed from the older generation. In fact, since one woman is a slave, and the other comes from a poor family, neither relationship seems likely to win parental approval.
Meanwhile, the fathers remain ignorant, not only of what the young men are doing but also of what their sons are really like. Demea thinks that he has created a boy in his own stern and upright image. He has no idea that Ctesipho is sneaking away whenever he can. Micio knows that Aeschinus is sowing his wild oats, but he cannot imagine that his son would ever fail to confide in him. It is doubly ironic, then, that Aeschinus not only deceives his father about seducing Pamphila but also admits to an involvement of which, in fact, he is innocent and then accepts his lenient father’s forgiveness for it.
Even though The Brothers has a dual plot, as do all but one of Terence’s plays, and though there are two love stories, this play is different from the other works because it does not focus on the love interest. The important pairings are not those of the lovers. The comparisons are between the two fathers; between the two sons, who, though so different in character, behave so much alike; and between the two fathers and sons.
Critics differ in their assessments of Micio and Demea. Some critics find Micio the more sympathetic of the two men, suggesting that his final punishment—losing money and property and acquiring an unwanted wife—is too harsh. Other critics agree with Demea that Micio is motivated not by true generosity but, instead, by laziness and a desire for popularity. These critics argue that he deserves what happens to him.
Another question is just how Terence wishes Demea to be viewed. If Demea actually chooses popularity over principle, he can hardly be respected. On the other hand, if he is merely tricking his brother in order to make a point, he goes too far. In either case, Demea seems to forfeit the...
(This entire section contains 933 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
sympathy of the audience. For some reason, however, Terence chooses him as the spokesman for moderation and, presumably, for the author.
There are, however, no problems of interpretation concerning the sons. Obviously, Ctesipho, the younger, is the weaker of the two, either by nature or perhaps because he has not been given a chance to make his own decisions. Certainly his willingness to let his brother take the blame for his own scheme does not say much for Demea’s force-feeding of moral principles. Most audiences find Aeschinus much more appealing. He is loyal to his brother, and if he lacks the courage to face his imminent fatherhood, at least he cannot allow the woman he loves to be married to another.
The father-son relationships in The Brothers resemble each other because both of them are based on illusion on the part of the fathers and deception on the part of the sons. The relationships are also similar, however, because they are based on real affection. The fathers would not feel so strongly about their sons’ conduct if they were not genuinely concerned about their future welfare. As for the sons, it seems unlikely that Ctesipho really dislikes his father, as Demea suggests in his bitterness. Although he does not appear in the last part of the play, Ctesipho previously shows no signs of callousness. It seems reasonable to assume that a youth so responsive to his brother’s kindness also appreciates his father’s efforts. As for Aeschinus, one need only look at his fourth-act soliloquy to ascertain the depth of his feeling for Micio. This speech may be as important a key to Terence’s own attitude as Demea’s final comments, which argue that in the rearing of children, the middle way between harshness and indulgence is best. It may be that even more important than commitment to any educational theory is children’s assurance that they have their parents’ unconditional love.