A Bird came down the Walk—

by Emily Dickinson

Start Free Trial

Student Question

How does "A Bird came down the Walk—" illustrate that nature cannot be tamed or fully understood?

Quick answer:

"A Bird came down the Walk—" illustrates that nature cannot be tamed or fully understood by depicting a bird that initially allows close observation but ultimately rejects human interaction and flies away. Emily Dickinson's portrayal emphasizes the divide between human society and the natural world, showing nature's unwillingness to be controlled and humanity's inability to fully connect with or comprehend it.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

It is absolutely true that Emily Dickinson explores the notion that humans cannot understand or tame nature in her poem "A Bird came down the Walk." In this poem, the speaker observes a bird on a path but, as soon as she tries to interact with the bird, he flies away from human contact. In her characteristically dense and ambiguous construction of this interaction, Dickinson muses on the divide between human society and the natural world. More specifically, by showing the bird fleeing from human contact, Dickinson illustrates not only nature's unwillingness to be tamed, but also humanity's inability to fully connect with or comprehend nature. As such, in this poem Dickinson presents the relationship between humans and nature as tenuous, uncertain, and ultimately incomplete. 

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How does "A Bird came down the Walk—" show Dickinson's ambivalent feelings toward nature?

There are a couple of spots where the speaker of "A Bird came down the Walk" voices conflicting, or ambivalent, feelings regarding nature,...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

primarily seen through her focus of the bird noted in the title.

In the first stanza, the speaker is focused on watching a particular bird who does not care to notice her. This is an oddity in nature as most birds are skittish around humans unless they have been trained in their interactions with them. However, this bird allows the speaker to both get close enough for her to inspect his meal yet doesn't care enough to allow her to interfere with his small hunt. Thus, she watches him eat a worm, biting it in half, swallowing it "raw." The connotation of "raw" is particularly interesting. After all, how else would a bird eat a worm? Yet this word choice conveys a barbaric and inhumane nature of the bird that is conflicting with typically peaceful images of birds which readers might conjure.

The speaker then attempts her own interaction with the bird. She offers him a "crumb," a little meal which he doesn't have to hunt for. This is also a food that is likely man-made, such as a crumb of bread which the speaker has brought with her. The bird not only rejects her human offering but flies away from her presence.

The speaker is distinctly separate from the realm of the bird, though she desires to be more involved with him; this leads to ambivalent feelings.

Approved by eNotes Editorial