Student Question
In Billy Budd, Sailor, does Claggart represent post-revolutionary Romanticism's individualism?
Quick answer:
Claggart in Melville's Billy Budd, Sailor can be seen as a figure of "dark Romanticism," embodying a corrupted form of individualism akin to Milton's Satan. His narcissistic pride and envy drive him to destroy innocence, reflecting a destructive, rebellious individualism. Although he shares some Romantic traits like passion and monomania, this individualism is negative, as he follows his base impulses rather than a moral code, making him a "dark Romantic individualist."
John Claggart, the villain in Herman Melville’s short novel Billy Budd, can in some ways be seen as an example of the kind of corrupted individualism sometimes associated with so-called “dark Romanticism.” Claggart is less an individualist than a narcissist. He is ruled by pride and arrogance, showing no respect, for instance, for common Christian virtues such as humility, honesty, and charity. He would never humble himself before God.
At one point, for instance, the narrator says of Claggart that there was in him
the mania of an evil nature, not engendered by vicious training or corrupting books or licentious living, but born with him and innate, in short "a depravity according to nature."
Claggart is a “Romantic” figure in much the same way that Milton’s Satan, in Paradise Lost , might also anachronistically be termed a “Romantic figure.” He sets his own rules and is the center...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
of his own moral universe. He is destructively envious of Billy partly because he knows that he himself can never be as morally pure and innocent as Billy is. Claggart’s impulse is to destroy the good he knows he can never achieve. Rather than humbling himself, he is driven by his pride. Rather than submitting to traditional religious morality, he is a rebel whose individualism is ugly rather than attractive.
Yet Claggart is “Romantic” in another sense. Despite his above-average intellect, he is also driven by emotion and passion –
passion, which assuming various secret forms within him, at times assumed that of cynic disdain -- disdain of innocence.
The narrator also soon describes him as “surcharged with energy” – another typical Romantic trait.
Like Captain Ahab in Melville’s Moby-Dick, Claggart is Romantic in another sense: he is monomaniacal. In fact, the narrator even speaks of “the monomania in the man.” Claggart feels driven to obey his own basest impulses rather than to conform to a conventional code of ethics. In this respect as in so many others, he resembles Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello – one of the other supreme egotists in literature.
In short, Claggart is a “Romantic individualist” in all the very worst senses of that term. He is driven by pride and envy to destroy whatever he dislikes. He is a dark Romantic in the same sense (though on a different scale) as Hitler might be called the same.
In Billy Budd, Sailor, is Captain Vere an example of Romantic individualism?
Captain Vere, in Herman Melville’s short novel titled Billy Budd, is one of the most complex characters in all of American literature. He is the focus of a great and enduring critical debate, with some critics seeing him as a virtuous man who does his best in enormously complicated circumstances, and others seeing him as an evil man who forces the execution of Billy Budd when there is no reason that Billy has to die. Proponents of the first view would see Captain Vere as a highly reasonable person who behaves responsibly; proponents of the second view would see Captain Vere as an individualist to the point of behaving immorally and even insanely.
Those who condemn Captain Vere often do so because they think he follows his own individual impulses rather than doing what is technically right and proper. They think that Vere, far from obeying orders and following customs, irrationally violates them and rigs Billy’s trial so that there is no way for Billy to receive a fair verdict. They think that Vere takes advantage of Billy’s innocence in ways that are, in some respects, even worse than the methods used by John Claggart. Critics who take this position see Vere as both the true villain and the truly dark Romantic individualist of this book.
Critics who think that Vere is a mentally disturbed individualist make much of the reaction of the ship’s surgeon to the captain. Thus, at one point Vere exclaims, concerning Billy, “‘Struck dead by an angel of God! Yet the angel must hang!’” The narrator then reports that in response to “these passionate interjections . . . the Surgeon was profoundly discomposed.” Later, the narrator reports as follows:
Full of disquietude and misgiving the Surgeon left the cabin. Was Captain Vere suddenly affected in his mind, or was it but a transient excitement, brought about by so strange and extraordinary a happening? As to the drum-head court, it struck the Surgeon as impolitic, if nothing more. The thing to do, he thought, was to place Billy Budd in confinement and in a way dictated by usage, and postpone further action in so extraordinary a case to such time as they should rejoin the squadron, and then refer it to the Admiral. He recalled the unwonted agitation of Captain Vere and his excited exclamations so at variance with his normal manner. Was he unhinged?
The surgeon seems to think that Vere displays a number of characteristics often associated with Romantic individualism, including excitement, unconventional behavior, a defiance of custom, and unusual agitation. Although Vere is seen by some critics as highly rational and as very much concerned with doing the proper thing, critics who attack Vere inevitably point to the surgeon’s misgivings. The surgeon thinks that Vere is making up his own procedures rather than following strict military regulations. In this sense, Vere can be seen as a defiant Romantic individualist who trusts his own instincts rather than going “by the book.”
Such doubts about Vere are strengthened when, a few sentences after the ones just quoted, the narrator reports that other officers aboard the ship also feel that Vere should not hold an impromptu trial on board the vessel but should instead wait and refer the matter to the admiral.
The narrator, in his typically ambiguous manner, encourages readers to decide for themselves whether Vere is insane.