Student Question
What falsehood was in Robert Ferguson's letter to Holmes and what evidence contradicts it?
Quick answer:
In "The Adventure of the Sussex Vampire," Robert Ferguson falsely claims in his letter to Holmes that he is writing on behalf of someone else. This is contradicted by Holmes's immediate recognition that the case involves Ferguson himself. Holmes's telegram to Ferguson reveals his awareness of Ferguson's deception, acknowledging that Ferguson's attempt to disguise his involvement was unsuccessful. Ferguson's ruse was motivated by his desire to protect his family's reputation and avoid police involvement.
In his letter to Sherlock Holmes in "The Adventure of the Sussex Vampire," Robert Ferguson claims that he is writing on behalf of someone else. Watson is taken in by Ferguson's subterfuge, but Holmes guesses straight away that the case is related to Ferguson himself. Evidently, Ferguson feels somewhat embarrassed at relating a vampire story to one of England's finest minds in case he should be thought to have taken leave of his senses. As we discover later, he also wants to protect his wife's good name while at the same time protecting his children. That being the case, he cannot go to the police.
Holmes replies to Ferguson's letter by telegram. We don't know exactly what Holmes writes in it, but when Ferguson turns up the following day in Holmes's study he makes it abundantly clear that Holmes has seen through his little charade:
I see by your telegram, Mr. Holmes, that it is no use my pretending to be anyone's deputy.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
References