Jolliment in Java
In the following essay, Ferdinand Mount critiques The Ponsonby Post by Bernice Rubens for leaning on stock characters and misprints, suggesting that the novel succeeds more as a thriller than a social satire, with its portrayal of post-colonial tensions relying excessively on clichéd cultural collisions.
Black farce very often thrives on stock characters and stock incidents. The grotesque needs the familiar to bounce off. Yet the presence of too many such stock elements suggests that the author's imagination is not actively engaged and instead is being towed along by established literary stereotypes. Throughout The Ponsonby Post there is an embarrassing contrast between the evidence of Bernice Rubens's talent—her irony and zip—and the evidence that in this case we are dealing with slipshod work, not helped by a bumper crop of misprints….
The more the book comes to resemble a thriller and the less a social satire, the more comfortable the author seems….
[The] guerrillas remain curiously beyond criticism, bathed in the soft glow of nineteenth-century holy oleographs. There are rich pickings to be had from the misunderstandings and mutual corruptions which result from these post-colonial collisions between West and East, between bloodless clock-bound rationalists and the inscrutable, unreliable natives who are in touch with primitive, sensual forces. Yet this genre has its own characteristic danger … which is to rely too heavily on the colourful incongruities of the collision and not bother much about the characters.
Ferdinand Mount, "Jolliment in Java," in The Times Literary Supplement (© Times Newspapers Ltd. (London) 1977; reproduced from The Times Literary Supplement by permission), No. 3926, June 10, 1977, p. 697.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.