Behind the Beautiful Forevers

by Katherine Boo

Start Free Trial

Editor's Choice

Why hasn't globalization lifted the Annawadi people out of poverty in "Behind the Beautiful Forevers"?

Quick answer:

Globalization has not lifted the Annawadi people out of poverty due to systemic issues such as entrenched caste systems, clientelism, and widespread corruption. These factors limit opportunities and advancement for the poor. Additionally, inadequate social programs, poor education access, and environmental hazards exacerbate their struggles. The benefits of globalization are often subverted by corruption, preventing the necessary "trickle down" effect, leaving the powerless to blame each other for their hardships.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The people of the Annawadi area of Mumbai grow up in drastic poverty. They have a thorough understanding of the Indian social system; most people, the author claims, also have faith in innate and learned skills that can help them cope and advance.

One widespread social feature is clientelism, in which people give jobs and provide services to only those with whom they have personal connections. In this primarily Hindu area, the old established caste patterns largely remain in place. This makes it difficult to get beyond the bottom rung of the advancement ladder.

Closely related is corruption, in which business and civic leaders take bribes for facilitating development. Particular neighborhoods, service providers, and even labor unions will be contracted only if they pay. The poor, even if they manage to start a business, cannot compete.

Another factor is neglect and lack of social programs. Increased industrialization brings more pollution and related waste. The state devotes few resources to mitigating these effects, so poor neighborhoods are left without potable water or sewer systems.

A desire for education is also thwarted by the low number and quality of public schools and the expense of, and competition to enter, private schools. For tech-heavy jobs in globalized concerns, people without education are basically shut out.

The environmental hazards in their living conditions also render the poor and marginalized more vulnerable to illness. This in turn adds to high infant mortality and neonatal illness, malnutrition, persistence of communicable diseases, and lower life expectancy. Low government investment in health and poor oversight over multinational companies' harmful practices, such as water pollution and toxic waste dumping, disproportionately harm the poorest of the poor.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Boo's work details how globalization can be easily subverted by efforts of corruption in order to ensure that the people most in need do not receive much in way of its benefits.  The individuals in Boo's work do not possess much in way of political power or economic power.  In order for globalization to work, it has to have a profound "trickle down" effect.  This is a system in which there are so many opportunities for individuals to subvert the system, a point in which Boo makes:

Instead, powerless individuals blamed other powerless individuals for what they lacked. Sometimes they tried to destroy one another. Sometimes, like Fatima, they destroyed themselves in the process.

The rising cost of living, the profundity of wealth for some and the dearth of it for others, as well as the corruption that enables this system to continue is what Boo attributes in terms of individuals blaming one another.  It is here where Boo is able to make clear that globalization might not be able to fully address or help individuals who are the most dire need of its help.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial