The Beggar's Opera Critical Evaluation
by John Gay

Start Your Free Trial

Download The Beggar's Opera Study Guide

Subscribe Now

Critical Evaluation

(Critical Survey of Literature for Students)

The Beggar’s Opera, one of the finest plays written in English in the early eighteenth century, follows in the satiric tradition of Jonathan Swift and Alexander Pope. John Gay’s purpose is likewise to ridicule the corrupt politics of his day and the follies of polite society. His depiction of crime and vice in all strata of society and his shrewd, humorous characterizations give the play universality. The Beggar’s Opera has remained popular since its first performances, both in its original version and in such reworkings as those by composers Benjamin Britten and Arthur Bliss; Bertolt Brecht’s adaptation of the original with music by Kurt Weill, The Threepenny Opera; and a fine British film version made in 1953.

The Beggar’s Opera was written as a satire of the government of King George II, represented by Macheath, and the Whig prime minister, Robert Walpole, represented by Peachum. Gay also satirizes the contrived but popular Italian operas and the simpler English alternative to them. The work features well-known English and Scottish ballads and airs to which Gay added his own lyrics.

Colley Cibber, whom Pope satirized in The Dunciad (1728-1743) and who managed the Drury Lane Theatre, unwisely declined to produce The Beggar’s Opera when Gay submitted it to him. At length a reluctant John Rich, of the Theatre Royal, agreed to produce the play. His fears of failure proved unwarranted, for the play became a great financial success. It was said at the time that The Beggar’s Opera made Gay rich and Rich gay.

Gay’s achievement and the reason for the play’s continued success is the fact that the work can be enjoyed without a knowledge of the contemporary political and theatrical milieu that it satirizes. The tone is jocular and bawdy, but it never lapses into bitterness or mere vulgarity. The diction is simple, the satire sharp, but the message is neither overly subjective nor acidic. The play may be considered as one long song, for it has that lyrical, bell-like quality of its finest airs. The plot, unlike the comedies of manners, the burlesques, and the farces popular at the time, is extremely simple, with no complicated and intertwining subplots to divert attention.

Like a song or ballad, The Beggar’s Opera has several refrains. One of these is the cynical view of love and marriage, a favorite theme of the comedy of manners. There is, too, the typical strain of antifeminism (“ Tis woman that seduces all mankind,” sings Filch in act 1, scene 2). As Gay makes clear, however, neither sex is faultless when it comes to romance. “Love,” says Lucy, “is so very whimsical in both sexes, that it is impossible to be lasting” (act 3, scene 8). That Macheath and Polly will at least attempt a lasting relationship is suggested by the song he sings to Polly in act 1, scene 13:

My heart was so free,It rov’d like the bee,’Till Polly my passion requited;I sipt each flower,I chang’d ev’ry hour,But here ev’ry flower is united.

Not the least aspect of this song’s effectiveness lies in its sexual imagery, which is typical of the play.

Two other refrains are the plays Gay...

(The entire section is 808 words.)