Literary Techniques
Similar to authors Jorge Luis Borges and Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Spark engages her audience with peculiar and extraordinary occurrences that both intrigue and, at times, frustrate. While her work does not fully embrace magical realism, Spark's approach in The Ballad of Peckham Rye exhibits similarities by incorporating the supernatural. The narrative unfolds with events that defy explanation, and the novel often seems aware of its own fictional nature.
In The Ballad of Peckham Rye, Spark shows little interest in
delivering a simple, "truthful" story. She frequently chooses to mislead the
reader, complicating matters unnecessarily. For instance, Spark never
conclusively reveals whether Dougal Douglas is a devil or merely an eccentric
man. His "horns" might be genuine or just cysts; they could have been lost in a
fight or surgically removed. His "claw" and hump might be demonic features or
simply deformities. Because Spark's narrative authority remains ambiguous,
Dougal becomes even more enigmatic, as the reader never fully knows if he is
supernatural. This creates a "making strange" effect in understanding the
novel.
Spark seems to take pleasure in blending falsehood and partial truth in The
Ballad of Peckham Rye. This enjoyment might partly originate from her early
career as a propagandist for the British Foreign Office during World War II.
She once remarked,
We were engaged in propaganda, crafting lies, which suited me just fine. Crafting lies to mix with truth. Mixing it all up and then distributing it for the German soldiers to digest, trying to convey something that wasn't true at all, or only partly true. . . . And so, naturally, that job was a good fit for me. It was inventive.
Spark also misleads readers by playing with the concept of time in the novel. The Ballad of Peckham Rye opens with an event that occurs near the story's end: Humphrey Place's return to Peckham Rye following his abandonment of Dixie Morse. The narrative then briefly shifts to describe the jilting itself (which happened "a few weeks" earlier) before returning to Humphrey's return. The first chapter concludes with an account of who did not hear the story of his return:
Miss Merle Coverdale, the former head of the typing pool, did not hear of it. Mr. Druce, the former Managing Director, did not hear of it. Nor did Dougal Douglas, the former Arts man, or his landlady Miss Belle Frierne, who had known all of Peckham in her youth.
What the reader does not yet know—and will not discover until nearly the end of the novel—is that, by that point in the story, these characters had not heard of Humphrey's return because they were either incarcerated, in Africa, or deceased.
The narrative frequently veers off on tangents and backtracks, until, by the end, Spark swiftly dismantles all our preconceived notions about the novel's conclusion. Interestingly, the novel starts not with its final scene but with the second-to-last one. The true ending, where Dixie and Humphrey actually wed, unfolds on the novel's very last page. Spark seems to playfully tantalize the reader in the concluding chapter with an array of potential endings for the story:
Some claimed Humphrey returned and eventually married the girl. Others argued he married someone else. Some believed Dixie died of a broken heart, and he never pursued another woman. A few thought he returned, only for her to slam the door in his face and call him a filthy swine, which he was. One or two recalled a brawl between Humphrey and Trevor Lomas. Yet, everyone remembered how a man had answered "No" at his wedding.
In the following paragraph, however,...
(This entire section contains 698 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Spark discloses the "truth" she intentionally withheld. This tactic underscores her command over the narrative and serves as a reminder that these are merely fictional figures. The reality of their experiences, if it exists at all, is entirely subject to the author's whims. Spark herself has explained her intention behind this kind of playful mischief in her satirical writing:
Satire ... has a more enduring impact than a straightforward depiction of what's wrong. I believe that many of the world's issues should be mocked, but mocked appropriately rather than lamented.... I truly see satire as a very, very powerful art form.
Ideas for Group Discussions
Spark's novel, The Ballad of Peckham Rye, explores issues of social class, class awareness, and their impact on ethics and gender relationships.
1. What symbolic role does the tunnel under Peckham Rye, which holds the remains of deceased nuns, play in the story?
2. Why does Dougal Douglas ultimately decide to leave Peckham Rye? Why doesn't he remain after negotiating his final pay increases at both companies?
3. Humphrey Place's decision to call off his engagement to Dixie Morse mirrors Dougal's behavior, even using Dougal's exact phrases. What motivates him to break off the engagement, and why does he come back?
4. Examine all of Nelly Mahone's statements about Dougal Douglas. Do they show consistency?
5. In what ways does The Ballad of Peckham Rye resemble a traditional mystery novel? How does it diverge from this genre?
6. Which female character in The Ballad of Peckham Rye is the most appealing? What makes her stand out?
7. How does the murder of Miss Coverdale contribute to Spark's overarching satirical objective?
Literary Precedents
Spark insists that she has no direct literary influences, stating, "I influence myself." While her distinctive blend of wit, satire, and the supernatural supports this claim, she does admit to some influences on her writing:
In terms of prose, I feel connected to a tradition linked to belletrists like Max Beerbohm, a humorist. On an intellectual level, writers such as Pritchett and that type of fantasy.... Additionally, although it might not seem so, I owe a great deal to Proust. I repeatedly read Proust.
Indeed, Beerbohm's works—he was an associate of Oscar Wilde, whose The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898) might have inspired Spark's title—share some of the elegance and ironic humor found in Spark's The Ballad of Peckham Rye. Beerbohm's caricatures and his early collection of short stories, Seven Men (1919), are notably insightful. Another British writer Spark acknowledges is V. S. Pritchett, whose works like The Spanish Virgin (1930) and You Make Your Own Life (1938) skillfully reveal human nature's quirks through satire and imaginative fantasy.
For wit and satire, Spark's The Ballad of Peckham Rye can be likened to Evelyn Waugh's fiction. His works Black Mischief (1932), Scoop (1938), and The Loved One (1948) are filled with absurd comedy and sharp social critique. Regarding the mystery and detective story aspects of The Ballad of Peckham Rye, Spark might also owe a debt to Edgar Allan Poe, another writer she greatly admires.
Spark's focus on sharp dialogue rather than detailed descriptions places her firmly in the tradition of the British intellectual novelist. The Ballad of Peckham Rye favorably compares to Henry James's The Turn of the Screw (1898), which also skillfully incorporates the supernatural into a seemingly ordinary world. Doris Lessing, who shares an African connection with Spark, is another British novelist who tackles serious social themes using fantasy and the supernatural; her work The Fifth Child (1988) is particularly relevant. However, Spark admits she is less "political" than Lessing and possesses more wit. Additionally, there is nothing in The Ballad of Peckham Rye that could be considered feminist.
Considering Spark's first book was a critical analysis of Mary Shelley, another clear literary influence is Frankenstein (1818), especially in how its protagonist relates to Dougal Douglas. Yet, with her unique blend of humor, the supernatural, and satire, Spark, as one critic recently noted, has "succeeded triumphantly in evading classification."
Bibliography
Baldanza, Frank. “Muriel Spark and the Occult,” in Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature. VI (Summer, 1965), pp. 190-203.
Kemp, Peter. Muriel Spark, 1974.
Malkoff, Karl. Muriel Spark, 1968.
Stanford, Derek. Muriel Spark: A Biographical and Critical Study, 1963.
Stubbs, Patricia. Muriel Spark, 1973.