Student Question
How can we apply the findings from Pavlov, Watson, Skinner, and Bandura's behaviorist experiments to our lives?
Quick answer:
Unconditioned response – the dog salivation in the presence of food. Evaluation of this answer: A+ = excellent, answer contains all parts of question and is well organizedAs we are limited in space, below are a few ideas to help get you started.
Let's focus on Ivan Pavlov's experiments with dogs.
In 1902, Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, discovered what
led to his theory of unconditioned responses. Pavlov observed
that his dogs salivated whenever they were being
fed but even began salivating simply when Pavlov
walked into the room, even if the dogs did not see food.
Pavlov reasoned that salivating in the presence of food was a "hard
wired" reflex for the dogs, or what we would call an
unconditioned response. An unconditioned response is simply an
unlearned response to stimulus, a response that happens
naturally (McLeod, "Pavlov's Dogs"). Pavlov
first developed an experiment to prove the dogs had an unconditioned response to food by giving the dogs bowls of food and then measuring their "salivary secretions" ("Pavlov's Dogs"). However,...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
he also soon noticed that the dogsbegan to salivate, not just in the
presence of food, but in the presence of anything associated with
food. For instance, during the experiment, Pavlov observed that the
dogs had no reaction to the lab assistant who fed the dogs;
however, as the experiment progressed, he noted that the dogs began to salivate
when the lab assistant walked into the room, just like they salivated whenever
Pavlov came into the room. Since the dogs did not salivate in the presence of
the lab assistant before but then began to, Pavlov was able to conclude that,
while salivating for food is an unconditioned response, salivating in the
presence of anything associated with food is a learned
response. Pavlov deemed the lab assistant a "neutral stimulus," which
is simply a stimulus that "produces no response" until a response is
learned.
Pavlov then developed a second experiment to test his theory
that neutral stimulus can produce conditioned, or
learned responses. In his second experiment, Pavlov used a
bell as a neutral stimulus. Anytime he fed the dogs, he also
rang the bell. Several times, he fed the dogs while ringing the bell. At first,
as expected, the dogs showed no response to the sound of the bell. He then
tried ringing the bell on its own. By this time, the dogs began
salivating when they heard the bell because by now they had
learned to associate the sound of the bell with being fed;
they had developed a conditioned response to the neutral stimulus of
ringing the bell ("Pavlov's Dogs").
If we know that human beings as well as dogs can developed conditioned
responses to neutral stimuli, we can use such responses to change our
own behavior. It has been argued that emotional
conditioning has been used throughout the ages to change our
values, to change various cultures beliefs in what is moral and
immoral (Prinz, "The
Death of Morality: Morality is the Culturally Conditioned Response"). We
can also use conditioning to change daily behaviors, such as
encouraging a roommate to start being more cleanly. We might use a reward, such
as promising to cook breakfast, if the roommate cleans her share of the room.
In that case, cooking breakfast would be considered the neutral stimulus as it
never would have induced the response of room cleaning before. However, as the
procedure continues, if the roommate really wants free, pre-cooked breakfast,
the roommate will become more and more conditioned to responding to breakfast
by cleaning the room.
References