Literary Techniques
"Arrow of God" is significant in shaping Achebe's writing style, as he thoroughly revised it a decade after its initial release. In this work, he honed techniques first employed in "Things Fall Apart." Bruce King describes Achebe's "structural" revisions as enhancements that align the novel through the perspective of the protagonist. Other critics note that the novel has shifted focus from explaining Igbo culture to Western readers. Nevertheless, the book vividly portrays Igbo life and customs, particularly around marriage, harvest, and healing, providing a rich sense of place.
Aside from a few flashbacks and scene changes to the British officials' outpost, the story follows a straightforward chronological order. Despite the plot's relatively simple structure, the characters' actions and reactions are continually tested by individual interpretations and the interplay of often conflicting and limited conventional wisdoms of both British and Igbo cultures, their laws, and their religions. Most British characters, except the worst, understand that their treatment of Africans must be reasonable to avoid provoking the Igbo. Clarke is so concerned about the consequences of keeping Ezuelu imprisoned that he consults Winterbottom in the hospital, even though Winterbottom is nearly too ill to respond. Winterbottom advises that Ezuelu's sentence should continue until he "learns to cooperate with the administration." Clarke feels a great sense of relief, partly because he has the appropriate language for his report and partly because he has Winterbottom's endorsement.
The narrative consistently invites readers to assess the characters' decisions. Ezuelu's political adversary, Nwaka, attributes his refusal to accept the Warrant Chief position to hereditary madness, despite previously accusing Ezuelu of political ambition. However, the narrator interjects that Nwaka’s spiteful remarks often contain some truth, revealing that Ezuelu's mother experienced mad fits, which were significantly mitigated by his father, "a powerful man with herbs." This detail foreshadows Ezuelu's vulnerability, as his numerous setbacks, estrangement from his community, and subsequent loss of power prevent him from averting his descent into madness.
Ezuelu's decision to avoid eating the sacred yams in multiples sparks a significant debate among the community. This discussion broadens our understanding of his dilemma, the community's challenges, and the unstoppable march of history. While the people present examples of change and adaptability, Ezuelu remains steadfast because he has not received any directive from Ulu. His statement that "the gods sometimes use us as a whip" fails to convince the men but sheds light on the title and mirrors his earlier thought that his son Oduchi is "an arrow in the hand of Ulu." Ironically, it might be Ezuelu himself who is the arrow, not wielded by Ulu but by the Christian god, facilitating the Christian resolution to the issue of the unharvested yams.
Several critics have highlighted the significance of proverbs and their usage by the characters. African characters often reference proverbs from both religions and act upon them. Oduche's absurd attempt to kill the python has its serious counterparts, such as the African Anglican priest Goodcountry leveraging the yam crisis to gain converts. Proverbs serve as tools for consolation, decision justification, and persuasion in group discussions. Obika's death scene is filled with mostly cautionary proverbs, all italicized, and "he felt like two separate persons, one running above the other." These proverbs suggest that behavioral advice has become so contradictory that making clear decisions is nearly impossible.
The British, on the other hand, are more inclined to use precedents, common sense, and the colonial mission to save Africans as justifications for their actions. Both groups of characters are concerned with historical precedent, and this concern often marks the more intelligent characters on both sides. Winterbottom, despite occasionally...
(This entire section contains 801 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
being misguided and insensitive, has a certain integrity derived partly from his extensive experience in the region. However, in the people's rationalizations about Ezuelu at the end of the book, history seems to be misappropriated: "Their god had taken sides with them against this headstrong and ambitious priest and thus upheld the wisdom of their ancestors — that no man however great was greater than his people; that no one ever won judgment against his clan."
Beyond proverbs and traditional sayings, Ezuelu creates a sense that the individual lives of the characters are part of an ongoing continuum observed by ancestors from their realm in Ani-Mmo. This idea is reinforced by the author's use of irony, providing a wider and more comprehensive perspective on the novel's events. This broader view persuades Achebe's non-African readers that ignoring the human tragedies, accomplishments, and possibly even the deities of Africans is a grave mistake.
As British officials discuss the practical advantages and disadvantages of their decisions or compare them to their perception of the "mission" of colonialism, and as Ezuelu contemplates his loyalty to Ulu and the responsibilities of his role toward his people, the reader is compelled to actively assess everything that transpires.
Literary Precedents
In the discussion below, Joyce Cary's Mr. Johnson and Conrad's Heart of Darkness are examined in relation to Things Fall Apart (1958). These works also relate to the theme of road construction and its ties to the British "mission" and the destruction of African culture, which is evident in Mr. Wright's enslavement and mistreatment of his workers. Numerous other authors, both African and European, strive to portray the clash between colonialism and indigenous African cultures, as well as the tyranny inflicted by rulers on both sides. Among these writers, Achebe's Nigerian contemporary, Wole Soyinka, stands out. Together, Soyinka and Achebe are considered giants in contemporary Nigerian literature. Additionally, Amos Tutuola, whose first book The Palm-wine Drinkard was reviewed by Achebe, may have heightened Achebe's appreciation for his own Igbo oral traditions.
Other authors who have chronicled the damaging impact of colonialism in Africa on both the colonizers and the colonized include Graham Greene, Doris Lessing, and Nadine Gordimer. George Orwell, who highlighted the issues of British colonialism in Myanmar (formerly Burma), also merits recognition.
The central character of Ezeulu, his futile attempts to address very real issues, and his role as a tragic hero, evoke comparisons to Greek tragic figures like Oedipus, as noted by other critics. In contrast, the supposedly rational Winterbottom and his steadfast African ally John Goodcountry seem insignificant, as they have not experienced the profound and conflicting insights and pressures that Ezeulu has faced.