Student Question
How does Shaw depict various forms of bravery in Arms and the Man?
Quick answer:
In Arms and the Man, Shaw depicts bravery through contrasting characters. Raina and her mother embody a romanticized, upper-class valor influenced by nationalism. Sergius displays a superficial bravado focused on appearances. In contrast, Bluntschli shows true bravery through resourcefulness and integrity, rising from a negative state to earn respect. Shaw seems to favor genuine, necessity-driven bravery over flamboyant heroics.
As of the expositional passage of the first scene, Raina and her mother are swept up in a nationalist frenzy of battle-glory and valor. This befits their sheltered, upper-class social milieu. Sergius, the returning hero of the battle that had raged beyond the perimeter of town, has cloaked himself in soldierly romance. The portrayal of heroism or bravery one step removed from the front lines is, to some degree, still actually brave and heroic. But it seems as though all of Sergius’s energy goes into appearances and self-aggrandization.
Bluntschli, by contrast, has no status or options; forced into service and pinned in, he has to live on instinct and wit. That he begins in such a negative state, and rises—essentially—to become a peer among the family fighting men, is in itself a testament to his resourcefulness and core integrity.
There’s reason to believe, based on Shaw’s treatment of other characters in his plays—like arms merchants directly responsible for destruction-for-profit, or someone like the play-acting Sergius—that the author favors the Dove (the man of peace) that fights when he must, rather than the Hawk that puts on the best display.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.