Student Question
What are the differences between Roman and Greek temples?
Quick answer:
Greek and Roman temples differ primarily in architectural style and location. Greek temples, influenced by classical styles, featured Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian columns and were typically built at sacred sites. In contrast, Roman temples incorporated innovations like concrete, enabling domes and arches, and were often situated in public spaces such as the Roman Forum. Greek architecture influenced Roman designs, reflecting a blend of cultural elements from the Hellenic world and Roman adaptations.
Greek and Roman temples share many architectural similarities due to the influence of the Hellenic world on Roman culture. Greece colonized southern Italy between the 8th and 5th centuries BCE, well before Roman occupation. Consequently, southern Italy was called Magna Graecia (Greater Greece) by most Romans and offered a source of Hellenic influence even before Greece was officially conquered by the Romans in 31 BCE.
One defining feature of Greek temples was their columns, which were split into three major categories during the classical and Hellenistic periods. These three categories were Doric (plain capitals), Ionic (rounded, scroll-like capitals), and Corinthian (decorative capitals), originating in Doris (and the wider Peloponnese), Ionia, and Corinth, respectively.
The main elements of Roman temples that separate them from their Greek counterparts are architectural innovations, like the invention of concrete that allowed for the creations of domes and arches, and their location. While Greek temples were dominantly erected at a holy site considered sacred to the particular deity, Roman temples were often constructed in popular public places like the Roman Forum.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
References