Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

by Philip K. Dick

Start Free Trial

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Themes

The main themes in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? are science and technology, the human condition, and the American Dream.

  • Science and technology: The central role of artificial intelligence in the novel raises questions about what it means to be human and how to use technology ethically.
  • The human condition: Deckard uses empathy tests to identify androids, because empathy is considered humanity's defining factor. But this belief is complicated by the fact that androids can feel empathy for each other.
  • The American Dream: Although Rick Deckard lives in a dystopian future, he is relatable in his striving for a new version of the American Dream.

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Study Tools

Ask a question Start an essay

Themes

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Last Updated August 15, 2024.

Science and Technology
Dick's fiction aims to challenge the idea that technology is merely a passive assistant, obedient servant, or extraordinary master. Likewise, the contrary belief—that humanity can revert to a simpler, agrarian lifestyle and exist in a farming utopia—is equally naive. According to Dick, these two perspectives actually threaten human progress: as long as people feel uneasy about their tools or see them as mysterious, they will attribute undue power to these tools. In essence, regardless of technology's flaws, if humans consider themselves less intelligent or capable than their inventions, they will be dominated by them. Technology will continue to advance, irrespective of the general public's opinions. Any effort to maintain control over new technology is destined to fail. Dick asserts that the only way to alleviate human discomfort with technology is to fully embrace it.

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? explores Dick's views on technology in a manner reminiscent of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. In Shelley's tale, the creature, brought to life from dead flesh, was a scientific triumph for its creator. However, the doctor was so repulsed by the creature's monstrous appearance that he ultimately destroyed it. In Dick's narrative, the issue with scientifically created androids is their striking similarity to their human creators. Yet, this is precisely what the market demanded and "what the colonists wanted," as Eldon Rosen states. "If our firm hadn't made these progressively more human types, other firms in the field would have." Thus, the problem isn't whether androids can mimic humans, but the ongoing categorization of androids as non-living entities. It becomes increasingly difficult to justify the enslavement and "retirement" of androids when they are nearly indistinguishable from humans. As Isidore tries to convey to the group of illegal androids, all life is sacred, even spiders—whose lack of empathy is, at one point, compared to that of the androids. The question then arises: why can't androids and technology, in all their animated splendor, be considered a form of life and, therefore, sacred?

Human Condition
Throughout the novel, humans are characterized as beings capable of empathy and possessing an "empathetic, role-taking ability." The Voigt-Kampff test aims to detect this empathy by observing if the subject reacts to a described scenario as if it were real for them. Even without the test, humans demonstrate their nature through their need for other living beings and their desire to be needed in return. Isidore states, "You have to be with other people … in order to live at all." To be human, to be alive, is to rely on others. Pris, Roy, and Irmgard achieve this to some extent and choose to accept Isidore. This acceptance is all the validation Isidore needs to see them as people, despite being "not alive" and illegal. Through the androids' teamwork and Isidore's acceptance, Dick suggests the possibility of a harmonious future. However, the definition of being human is constantly tested and reaffirmed through interactions with androids—humans maintain their identity by eliminating those who are almost human. Dick explores humanity's inhumanity by placing humans in a situation where they must defend their identity by eliminating their imitators. This creates a tense condition, similar to the tension between the chickenhead and his employer, filled with anger and resentment. The laws that separate "human" from "special" and "android" are akin to the Jim Crow laws in America, Apartheid in South Africa, or ethnic cleansing.

Phil Resch serves as an exception to the novel's general theory of the human condition. (A similar case can be made for Iran, who is preoccupied with her own personal issues until the end.) Resch is...

(This entire section contains 1330 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

a human who shows concern for Deckard and cares for his real squirrel. However, his cruel disregard for androids leads Deckard to question his humanity. Resch believes that artificial constructs have no value, dehumanizing them much like the Nazis dehumanized Jews during the Holocaust. This lack of empathy in one aspect of an individual's psyche can lead to violence. The question then arises: why target androids for retirement? How can violence be confined to illegal androids? This concern grows, especially if the Voigt-Kampff test becomes unreliable. What if a schizophrenic is mistakenly retired? What happens when Sloat truly targets Isidore? Deckard comes to understand that humanity must extend empathy even to artificial constructs. For the environment, this is the only way to bring the owls back to the skies.

Regarding Deckard's personal development, he has come to understand that interacting with his electric sheep diminishes his self-esteem. Each day, he goes through the motions of caring for an inanimate object as if it were alive. He feels burdened by the need to maintain the illusion that he owns a real animal. "The tyranny of an object … [is that] it doesn't know I exist. Like the androids, it had no ability to appreciate the existence of another." This is why Deckard desires a genuine animal—something that not only acknowledges his existence but also needs him in return. Over time, he develops empathy for artificial life and is even willing to accept the toad. Ultimately, however, Deckard finds peace as his wife takes on the role of making him feel needed.

American Dream
The "American Dream" is often described as the freedom to achieve material success, typically represented by owning a home in a pleasant suburb. In a twisted version of this suburban ideal, Dick depicts a society where the ultimate goal is to have a home on a space colony. In this scenario, the healthy individuals of Earth are sent to other planets and provided with a slave robot to manage their homestead. (Ironically, the term "robot" originates from a Czech play about a nobleman who replaces his serfs with human-like machines.) On Earth, where those who are not smart or healthy enough to emigrate remain, the dream for most people is to own a real animal. The darker aspect of this suburban reality is that the wife remains confined at home. Much like her 1950s counterpart, she spends her time watching television. In Dick's future vision, she has a machine that can dial up different moods. There is even a specific number to dial for the mood to watch television—and Dick does not foresee the programming improving. Remarkably, Iran can even dial up her own depression. To combat loneliness, she can connect with unhappy people everywhere through an empathy machine. These distorted takes on the "American Dream" portray suburbia as an inherently isolating society that accelerates the breakdown of human community.

Morals and Morality
Decades before his time, Dick anticipated the moral dilemmas that would arise from a capitalist, technological society. In the universe of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, moral codes are those that bolster the economic framework and ensure people's happiness. Mercerism instills a sense of empathy in people, which coincidentally proves profitable: Every living creature is deemed sacred due to the nuclear war, making the ownership of a living animal a status symbol. While Mercerists value the care of living beings, this responsibility is paradoxically driven by market forces. Similarly, Eldon Rosen doesn't question the ethics of creating androids that are indistinguishable from humans; he simply caters to consumer demand. "We followed the time-honored principle underlying every commercial venture," he explains to Deckard. "If our firm hadn't made these progressively more human types, other firms in the field would have." Rosen argues that his moral position is superior to that of the police and their flawed empathy test. The security of the system depends on the bounty hunter's ability to identify and eliminate illegal androids, yet the system's expansion hinges on the Rosen Association's capability to produce androids so lifelike that they render the bounty hunter's task futile. As the Rosens succeed, industry will assume the role of natural evolution, reintroducing perfect animals into the wild and gradually creating an ideal human/android race. Ultimately, everyone will be content, as there will be no bounty hunters to worry about issues of identity.

Previous

Chapter Summaries

Next

Characters