The Ancient World

Start Free Trial

Editor's Choice

What are the differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire?

Quick answer:

The Roman Republic and Roman Empire differed mainly in governance structure. The Republic featured a Senate, power shared between elected consuls, and limited democracy with aristocratic dominance. Internal conflicts and power struggles, notably involving figures like Julius Caesar, weakened the Republic. In contrast, the Empire centralized power under a single ruler, as seen with Augustus, who, while maintaining a facade of traditional governance, held significant authority, marking a shift to autocratic rule for stability and peace.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was primarily one of a patina of democracy versus outright dictatorship. Under the Republic, Rome was governed by a Senate, its members appointed by two powerful consuls whose tenures were strictly restricted to avoid the emergence of an absolute dictator. The Republic was in no sense a democracy, but the size and influence of the Senate at least allowed for deliberative debate and consensus. It was precisely this deliberative construct, however, that eventually undermined its effectiveness, and its tenure proved short-lived. Senators sometimes disagreed on important issues, such as the benefits of a senate over alternative, less deliberative, forms of government. With no real countervailing parliamentary body to oppose or against which to propose policy, the Roman Senate devolved into a rudderless, useless morass of dissent and greed. Enter, then, the autocratically-included members of Rome’s ruling elite, such as Marcus...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Licinius Crassus, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, otherwise known as Pompey the Great, and Gaius Julius Caesar, whose name would become synonymous with dictatorial and imperial ambitions and whose assassination by his one-time colleagues became one of the seminal events in human history. These three individuals collectively ruled as the First Triumvirate: in short, a trio of autocratic personalities with little to no regard for the concept of elective government.

While the Roman Senate as an institution had been rendered ineffective and Rome increasingly dominated by Pompey and Caesar, these two military and political leaders turned against each other and became bitter and violent enemies, the former continuing to, at least ostensibly, support the concept of a senate, the latter adamant that he and only he could save Rome. Caesar ultimately prevailed in this conflict, and his accession to the pinnacle of political power in Rome was both absolute and exceedingly temporary, his assassination a sign of the city-state’s continued weariness of one-man rule.

In short, then, the Republic was ruled by a number (originally around 900) of senators whose individualism and conflicting personal and political agendas led to concerns about chaos—concerns that were exploited by Julius Caesar and others whose ascent to power and marked proclivity for military expansionism marked the transition from Republic to Empire. The defining feature of the Republic, however, was the size, composition, and influence of the Senate. As the Senate weakened, the Republic faded, replaced by autocratic rule.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is the difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire?

The main difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire concerned the institutions of government. Under the Republic, power was dispersed between the Roman aristocracy and the common people, or plebs. The Senate was the main instrument of power of Roman nobles, whereas the plebs could vote for a tribune to represent their interests. Furthermore, there was no one ruler of Rome; power was shared between two consuls, and both of them were elected to serve one year in office.

In practice, however, the Roman Republic was beset by bitter struggles between powerful aristocrats such as Julius Caesar and Pompey, and it was these struggles that eventually led to the downfall of the Republic and its replacement with the imperial system of government.

Once Octavian—later Augustus—became the first emperor, supreme power was vested in just one man. Octavian was clever in that he didn't openly declare himself as Emperor; the title was conferred upon him by a grateful Senate. He knew what had happened to his uncle, Julius Caesar, when he overreached himself and accrued too much power.

So, at the outset of his lengthy reign, Augustus modestly stated that he would exercise power in accordance with the old traditions. But this was all just for show. In reality, Augustus would come to acquire much more power than Julius Caesar could have dreamed of.

In addition to benefitting from his remarkable ability to hide his true motives, Augustus benefitted from the Roman people's war fatigue. They were fed up of constant strife and wanted peace and stability. And for this, they were prepared to invest Augustus with enormous, almost dictatorial powers.

Approved by eNotes Editorial