An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum Themes
The three main themes in "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum" are poverty, communism and education, and knowledge and revolution.- Poverty: Spender exposes the widespread neglect of children of all nationalities, races, and ethnicities, and how poverty harms the students due to the oppressive power of capitalism.
- Communism and Education: The poem provides a case for why a Marxist solution to the educational crisis caused by poverty is the only choice.
- Knowledge and Revolution: When children are empowered by a substantial, honest education, they can free themselves from obscurity, poverty, and pain.
Poverty
The theme of poverty is central to the poem "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum." Spender vividly portrays children living in poverty through his descriptions of bleak circumstances and undernourished students, unveiling a sorrowful, overlooked part of society that exists globally. He does not specifically address any one nation in his poem; rather, he highlights the widespread disregard for children of all nationalities, races, and ethnicities. It is poverty that causes the students in "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum" to appear "weighed-down," "paper-seeming," afflicted by disease, and "twisted." Spender suggests that this poverty is a result of the oppressive influence of capitalism.
This poem was crafted during the American Civil Rights movement, and although Spender was British, the injustices occurring in the United States were a global concern that impacted the entire world, particularly close English-speaking allies like Britain. Spender was moved by the fight for equality in the United States due to his strong commitment to social and political reform. Although this poem was penned during a time of severe racial injustice in America, Spender does not specifically focus on disadvantaged children based on race, religion, or creed. Instead, he directs his poem's content towards the social injustices faced by all children, making it harder to overlook. When attention is drawn to a specific group, some individuals may dismiss or question the legitimacy of that group's struggles. However, when attention is directed towards children in general, it becomes impossible to ignore. Regardless of their background, history, race, or ethnicity, children are innocent and rely on the support of society. Without assistance, children are essentially abandoned, leaving adults who fail to help with an inescapable sense of guilt and inadequacy. Spender evokes these feelings in his poem and uses them effectively to convey a powerful message about poverty, its impact on children, and the oppressive nature of wealth.
Communism and Education
In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx emphatically asserts that education is "social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention of society, direct or indirect, by means of schools." Spender echoes this sentiment in "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum," advocating for a complete overhaul of the prevailing social system regarding its influence, both direct and indirect, on education. While this poem may not be explicitly labeled as Communist, a detailed analysis reveals a Marxist approach to addressing the educational challenges stemming from poverty.
Spender criticizes the "donations" provided to the students, viewing them as a subtle intrusion of capitalist society into the educational system. These contributions are not intended to enhance the children's education but rather to maintain their status as members of the lower class. This is achieved by depicting an external world that seems out of reach, thereby trapping the children in a cycle of unfulfilled dreams or, as a last resort, crime as a means to acquire wealth and escape the slum. Spender calls for a practical change in how these donations are distributed and utilized—a Communist strategy—where funds empower children to genuinely explore books, maps, the world, and themselves. Essentially, it would allow them to pursue education without the lure of unattainable aspirations or a future filled with unfulfilled hopes.
This revised utilization of "donations" reflects a Communist perspective on education. "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum" portrays the children as the proletariat and the donors as the bourgeoisie. Spender does not seek to remove education from society but aims to transform it into a system governed by a Communist, rather than capitalist, framework. In this system, every child would have an equal opportunity to succeed,...
(This entire section contains 327 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
irrespective of their social background. This transformation necessitates a proletarian revolution to alter the social landscape, as Spender, like Marx, continues to believe that education is fundamentally social and should only be influenced by a Communist society.
Knowledge and Revolution
The theme of knowledge and its impact on revolution is central to "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum." As mentioned earlier, this poem strongly supports Communism and its potential to transform education and eliminate poverty. However, Spender's unwavering belief in the power of education stands out as the most empowering and crucial factor for humanity's future. For Spender, the children's minds hold the brilliance of the sun and have the ability to dispel the darkness of their bleak future. He states, "History theirs whose language is the sun." These children, when equipped with a rich and genuine education, can develop a mental strength that will liberate them from futures "painted with a fog." With knowledge, the children can alter the future, raising their educated voices in defiance to topple the oppression that seeks to confine them.
Spender finds himself in a predicament with these declarations. While it may be true that knowledge is a form of empowerment, and empowerment is the sole hope for change, which relies on revolution, it seems that education cannot evolve without a reformed society. This creates a vicious cycle. Education is inherently social, and the capitalist system interfering with education does not serve the proletariat's interests. Consequently, education primarily benefits the bourgeoisie. To disrupt this prevailing system, the proletariat must become educated, yet the bourgeoisie's control over society makes it challenging, if not impossible, for them to access education. This naturally leads to a broader discussion about a workers' revolution and the establishment of Marxism to dismantle the prevailing capitalist system. Spender does not provide a solution to the conflict between proletariat and bourgeoisie, Communist and capitalist, in his poem. His exploration of knowledge and revolution in "An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum" aims to highlight the transformative power of education and the need to revamp how society provides knowledge to everyone, regardless of social or economic standing.