Allen Tate Criticism

Allen Tate (1899–1979) stands as a pivotal figure in American letters, renowned for his poetry, criticism, and role as a novelist. A leading member of the "Fugitive Group," Tate's work is deeply rooted in the cultural and historical context of the American South, yet it transcends regional boundaries through its exploration of universal themes. His literary contributions are marked by their classical-Christian underpinnings, offering a critique of modernity's abstractions and striving for unity between spirit and flesh, as observed by Cleanth Brooks. Renowned for his linguistic precision and depth, his poetry challenges readers with its complexity, often revealing new meanings with each reading, as praised by Roy Fuller.

Tate's oeuvre extends beyond poetry, including critical essays and a novel that mirror his engagement with Western cultural and intellectual issues, such as dualism and solipsism, as noted by J. A. Bryant, Jr. His novel, The Fathers, delves into the tension between traditional Southern values and modern ideologies, with characters representing these conflicting worlds, as analyzed by Thomas R. West. His poetic vision navigates a complex interplay of pastoral and epic themes, demonstrating his struggle with the dissociation of sensibility, a theme explored by Radcliffe Squires.

Tate's work is characterized by a "texture of allusions and intricate phraseology," as observed by A Critics Poetry. His use of classical motifs is further explored in poems like "Aeneas at Washington," where he contrasts ancient definitions of honor with the modern era's solipsism. Tate's poetic style evolved over time, incorporating his conversion to Roman Catholicism and the influence of Dante, particularly evident in his later works such as the "Maimed Trilogy." This shift is elaborated upon by Vergil, Allen Tate, and the Analogy of Experience, noting his "radical understanding of tradition."

Critics have often noted the dense, multi-layered nature of Tate's poetry, which has limited his wider popular appeal. However, his integration of classical and Southern themes underlines his significance in American literature. Despite being seen as a regional or "Southern writer," his work transcends these boundaries through its universal exploration of tradition, memory, and identity, as highlighted by Allen Tate's Use of Classical Literature. Tate continues to be a subject of critical study, with discussions centering on his thematic evolution and the intricate interplay between his poetry and historical context.

As a major figure of the New Criticism movement, Tate's critical philosophy was rooted in the belief that literature transcends mere social, historical, or scientific analysis. He argued against the reduction of literature to these terms, maintaining that it is an inexhaustible object of contemplation. His religious and humanist convictions informed his view that critics should focus on the spiritual and moral insights literature offers, as highlighted in essays by Monroe K. Spears and Eliseo Vivas. Throughout his career, Tate was lauded for his love of literature and respect for language, contributing significantly to the understanding of poetry's relationship with tradition and its cognitive value, as explored by R. J. Schoeck and Northrop Frye.

Tate's literary legacy is marked by his ability to blend personal and cultural conflicts into a cohesive artistic vision, making him a pivotal figure in 20th-century American literature. His formal and elegant structures examine man's attachment to the past, as emphasized by Hilton Kramer. Despite his complex relationship with New Criticism, Tate's work remains a testament to the profound responsibility of the 'man of letters' in shaping cultural values and human destiny.

Read Full Introduction

Allen Tate Criticism

Contents