Analysis
In Aristophanes’ comedy The Frogs, Aeschylus defends his work against Euripides’ challenges by emphasizing the heroic spirit and spectacle present in his plays. Aeschylus’ tragedies, such as The Persians and Seven Against Thebes, were known to inspire audiences with themes of valor and heroism, blending dramatic visuals with moral lessons. His contributions to Greek tragedy, reflected in works like The Oresteia and Prometheus Bound, remain central to understanding the evolution of dramatic literature.
Aeschylus and His Dramatic Style
Aeschylus’s work is characterized by a heroic spirit, didactic messages, and grand theatrical spectacles. These features are evident in his play The Persians, the earliest of his seven extant tragedies. In it, Aeschylus presents a balanced view of heroism, sympathetically portraying both Greeks and Persians. The Greeks’ victory is not solely attributed to their courage but also highlights the Persians' hubris, teaching that pride can lead to downfall. This lesson was particularly pertinent to the Athenians, who frequently needed reminders of the dangers of excessive pride throughout the fifth century b.c.e.
Spectacle and Innovation
Visual spectacle was a crucial aspect of Aeschylus’s plays, often achieved through striking costumes and dramatic scenes. For instance, Eumenides reportedly featured horrifying visuals of the Furies that unsettled audiences, while Libation Bearers displayed the blood-drenched bodies of Aegisthus and Clytemnestra. These vivid images, combined with Aeschylus's powerful verbal imagery, made his tragedies both gripping and memorable. Beyond spectacle, Aeschylus pioneered several key innovations in Greek tragedy. Aristotle credits him with introducing a second actor, thereby enhancing dialogue and allowing different viewpoints to be explored.
Theatrical and Thematic Contributions
The introduction of a second actor was pivotal in expanding the narrative possibilities of Greek tragedy. With this innovation, Aeschylus could construct more dynamic dialogues, explore complex interactions, and develop a richer dramatic experience. His plays focused less on individual characters and more on sweeping historical and religious themes. This approach is evident in connected trilogies such as The Oresteia, which traces the evolution of justice from familial retribution to civic law, or the Prometheus Bound, which explores the conflict between force and justice.
Exploring Moral Complexity
Aeschylus’s plays often grapple with profound theological questions, such as the reasons for human suffering and the allowance of evil by a supreme deity. While his contemporaries like Euripides examined human impulses, Aeschylus reimagined primitive myths with elevated moral and religious tones. His treatment of myths often removed moral ambiguities, as seen in Seven Against Thebes, where the defender of Thebes is portrayed as morally right. In the words of Aristophanes’ depiction of him in The Frogs, Aeschylus believed it was the poet’s duty to emphasize noble themes and avoid glorifying base truths.
The "Double Bind" and Human Struggle
Central to Aeschylus’s tragedies is the concept of the “double bind,” where characters face insurmountable dilemmas. Orestes, for example, must choose between avenging his father by killing his mother or abandoning his familial duty. Eteocles in Seven Against Thebes must defend Thebes against his brother or leave the city vulnerable. These scenarios highlight the inescapable moral and ethical challenges his characters face, reflecting the complexity of human struggles within the grand narratives of fate and divine will.
Language and Imagery
The grandeur of Aeschylus’s vision is mirrored in his language, which is rich in metaphor and complex structures. He famously used compound words and intricate grammatical constructions to elevate the dialogue’s nobility, reflecting the epic scope of his themes. The opening chorus of Agamemnon , for instance, uses descriptive language to enhance the dramatic atmosphere, portraying Agamemnon and his brother as "twin-throned and twin-sceptered" leaders....
(This entire section contains 1103 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Such expressive language was integral to maintaining the majestic tone across his plays.
Exploring "Seven Against Thebes"
Seven Against Thebes was the final play in a trilogy that originally included Laius and Oedipus. Aeschylus crafted a narrative where the curse on Thebes culminates as Eteocles must confront his brother Polyneices among the seven generals attacking the city. Reflecting the political climate of Athens post-Persian Wars, the play avoids directly mentioning Thebes, using "city of Cadmus" instead to avoid offending the audience. The plot heavily emphasizes themes of loyalty and betrayal, resonating with Athenians who had recently overcome foreign threats.
Heroism and Static Drama
The play’s structure, featuring a catalog-like description of the seven attacking generals, may appear static but served to build tension incrementally. Audiences of the time favored such vivid descriptions, appreciating the detailed imagery of the enemy’s armor and insignias. This arrangement also underscores Eteocles’ inexorable path to facing his brother, a tension that would have resonated deeply with contemporary viewers attuned to issues of loyalty and patriotism.
Themes of "The Oresteia"
The Oresteia, the sole surviving Greek trilogy, explores the curse on Agamemnon’s family and the evolution of justice from personal vengeance to institutionalized law. The trilogy begins with Agamemnon's murder by Clytemnestra upon his return from Troy, followed by Orestes avenging his father’s death by killing his mother. Pursued by the Furies for his matricide, Orestes’ plight illustrates the transition from blood vengeance to a judicial system as Athena establishes a court to judge him.
The Intersection of Law and Divine Intervention
Aeschylus presents the establishment of the Athenian court as a pivotal moment in societal progress, illustrating the shift from family-enforced justice to city-governed law. His portrayal of divine intervention, with gods like Apollo and Athena resolving the cycle of vengeance, underscores the necessity of divine wisdom in achieving true justice. The imagery of light and darkness, blood, and animals throughout The Oresteia reinforces these themes, linking the plays to one another and deepening the narrative’s moral and philosophical exploration.
Understanding "Prometheus Bound"
Prometheus Bound opens a trilogy exploring the tension between divine authority and justice, with Prometheus punished by Zeus for aiding humanity. Despite its “static” nature, with Prometheus bound throughout, the play effectively conveys his enduring suffering and defiance against tyranny. The themes of justice and proportion suggest a narrative arc where balance between Zeus’s rule and Prometheus’s compassion would eventually be restored, a resolution lost with the remaining parts of the trilogy.
Static Energy in Drama
The lack of physical movement in Prometheus Bound serves to heighten the emotional and thematic tension, drawing audiences into the stasis of Prometheus’s plight. Much like Seven Against Thebes, where the apparent static action conceals deep narrative tension, Aeschylus's plays invite the audience to consider the broader implications of the characters’ struggles and the moral questions they present. Through his pioneering dramatic techniques and profound thematic investigations, Aeschylus established a foundation for tragedy that would influence generations of playwrights to come.