What are the advantages and Limitations of skills-based syllabuses?
of skills-based syllabus
There is no serious basis for determining skills, and they focus on discrete aspects of performance rather than on developing more global and integrated communicative abilities, is this true OR NOT??? and WHY???
An advantage of a skills-based syllabus is that it can make test writing (and administration) a uniform and streamlined process.
Like others have said, however, the assessment may or may not an accurate picture of what a student actually knows or understands.
Think about it. It is fairly easy to "test" a skill. However, mastery (or non-mastery) of a skill does not necessarily reflect a student's ability to think, reason, or process. Skills-based learning is very low on the higher order thinking continuum.
The great danger of skills-based syllabuses is indeed the assumption that all knowledge can be boiled down to specific procedures or demonstrations of knowledge that should be performed on demand and evaluated through defined measurements. As the use of high-stakes evaluations become more widely used - the people who control the allocation of funding for education love such tests because the data obtained from the tests makes it easy to draw lines between acceptable and nonacceptable test results - I fear for the future of "global and integrated communicative abilities" and other areas of learning that are essential but difficult to measure objectively.
I think that the biggest advantage of a skill-based syllabus would be to have a set schedule and base to go off of when teaching. The drawback to this could be that it would be rigorous and could prove difficult to many students, but I think for most it would be helpful for them as well as the teachers.
Hope this helps!