Do you think Late Antiquity was a period decline or foundation?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The short answer is that Late Antiquity was a time of both foundation and decline. By the end of the fourth century C.E., the Eastern and Western portions of Rome’s empire were divided along linguistic, cultural, economic, and political lines. The fragmentation of Rome’s consolidated power left it vulnerable to...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

The short answer is that Late Antiquity was a time of both foundation and decline. By the end of the fourth century C.E., the Eastern and Western portions of Rome’s empire were divided along linguistic, cultural, economic, and political lines. The fragmentation of Rome’s consolidated power left it vulnerable to attack from external enemies. Most famously, in 493-525, the Ostrogothic king Theodoric conquered Italy, significantly increasing the strength of Constantinople to influence the affairs of the old Roman Empire. The glory of the Roman Empire was at an end.

But this period also witnessed vast political and intellectual transformation both in the old Roman heartlands and in other world regions. In Rome proper, the most famous of these transformations came with the rise of Justinian (527-65), who was responsible for codifying Roman law and setting a precedent that all later Western code law would be based upon. The Byzantine (East Roman) Empire expanded from the Balkans down into eastern Turkey, and benefitted immensely by trade with the emergent Islamic empire and by the expansion of Byzantine scholarship. Byzantine academics studied the ancient Greek epics, including Homer, Plato, Thucydides, and Aristotle, and even learned much of the scientific literature that was coming out of the Islamic world at the time.

In Arabia, Muhammad (b. 570 in Mecca) was preparing to launch Islam onto the world stage. After his hijrah, or his pilgrimage from Mecca to Medina, Muhammad formed a strong, cohesive, and consolidated Islamic community, or umma. The Islamic umma proceeded to travel around the Arabian Peninsula and convert Bedouin tribes to Islam. After Muhammad’s death, his father-in-law, Abu-Bakr, facilitated the spread of the Muslim Empire into the West. By 750, the Umayyad caliphate could claim an empire that spread from the Arabian Penninsula, east to the edges of Persia, and westward, all across north Africa and into Al-Andalus of Spain. It was an incredibly productive time for the spread of Islam and the emergence of the new religious empire.

Late Antiquity also saw the rise of several initially small but powerful kingdoms on the periphery of the Old Roman empire, which would flourish in the subsequent centuries. In 862, according to the Russian Primary Chronicle, a group of tribesmen from central (current-day) Ukraine asked the Varangians to come and settle their capital city of Kiev. Rurik, the legendary first king of the Russians, acquiesced, and established the Rurikid dynasty in Kiev, leading to the birth of the Kievan Russian principality. Just north of Italy, the lands of Gaul also opened up to Viking invasion after the decline of Roman presence there. After a series of conflicts between the first Merovingian kings, the Frankish leader, Charlemagne, eventually built a strong military and bureaucracy in the territory, shifting the concentration of wealth and power tremendously in Gaul. Charlemagne – in German, “Charles the Great” – came to rule over a vast kingdom starting in 768. He was eventually crowned by the Pope himself. The Carolingian empire expanded all over current-day mainland France, and, according to the Frankish epic The Song of Roland, successfully campaigned against the Saracen kings in northeastern Spain.

Thus, even though Europe saw the decline of perhaps the most formidable of empires of the ancient world, Rome’s decline precipitated the rise of many new groups of peoples and successful kingdoms.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

It is possible to view Late Antiquity as both a period of decline and of foundation. Perhaps, it is better to view it as one of transition. In Europe and the Near East, it saw the end of the supremacy of the Roman Empire and Classical culture. This was gradually replaced by feudal societies that came to dominate the Middle Ages.

Political transformations of this era were major. Soon after Constantine moved his capital to Constantinople in the 4th Century, a great bureaucracy developed that replaced the age-old system favoring elected magistrates and landowners. After the decline and eventual fall of Rome in western Europe, local rulers became the seat of power.

This period also saw the decline of pagan religions and the founding and restructuring of Abrahamic religions. Christianity grew from a fringe cult to the dominant faith in Europe. As it supplanted and absorbed older faiths, including the Roman state religion, it became the official and often only recognized religion throughout much of Europe. In the 7th Century, the new religion of Islam united the Arab tribes who quickly went on to conquer North Africa and the Middle East.

In short, Late Antiquity was a time of vast changes. This included a stark shift in culture, religion, politics, and human settlement. Transition often means something old is lost in order for something new to take its place. This was very much the case in Europe at this time. Classical culture declined in order for medieval society to emerge. Viewed this way, it is possible to argue that this period was one of both decline and foundation.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Very good arguments can be made for viewing Late Antiquity (ca. 200–800) as a period of decline or one of foundation. Many scholars take the stance that both characterizations are simultaneously valid, as the evaluation depends on the society and geographical area on which one is focusing. For many years, the period that began with the waning years of imperial Roman power was invariably considered one of decline. This idea was promoted by Edward Gibbons’ 1776 work, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which established a position that remained largely unchallenged until the twentieth century. However, positing Rome as uniquely central in cultural development and the pre-Middle Ages as essentially devoid of civilization has been heavily criticized as an ethnocentric perspective. Numerous other societies were developing in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, and Northern Africa.

Significantly, the spread of Christianity in the Eastern (or Byzantine) Empire and the birth of Islam during Muhammad’s lifetime occurred far from Italy. Scholars have argued that during these five to six centuries, the network of communication and, to some extent, shared values united a geographic area and laid the foundation for further cultural development. Despite religious differences, for example, a changeover to the primacy of monotheism characterizes the era.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team