Would you consider limiting the application of the exclusionary rule to certain less serious types of crimes or abolishing it altogether?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

No.  Without the exclusionary rule, there would be no feasible way to force police to obey the 4th or 5th Amendments.  These protections are always important and are perhaps even more important in serious crimes where defendants face severe punishment if convicted.

If there were no exclusionary rule, what incentive would police have to obey the 4th and 5th Amendments?  Conceivably, people who believed their rights had been violated could sue, but the chances of criminals winning civil suits against the police would be slim.  Without the exclusionary rule, there would essentially be no 4th or 5th Amendments and the police would have free rein to search anyone, anywhere without serious fear of repercussions.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial