Why did the writer choose not to give a name to the narrator?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The writer, Edgar Allen Poe, chose to purposely not give the narrator a name.  This gives the narrator credibility in his meeting with Roderick and the events leading to the downfall of the family name.  He can account for how he knew Roderick as a boy and how he has...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

The writer, Edgar Allen Poe, chose to purposely not give the narrator a name.  This gives the narrator credibility in his meeting with Roderick and the events leading to the downfall of the family name.  He can account for how he knew Roderick as a boy and how he has changed so many years later.  He can attest to his gradual downfall just through the short amount of time he has spent visiting.  This story is written from first person point of view and all of the characters and occurrences are described by him. 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

hmm...that's a good question. I've always thought that Poe didn't give the narrator a name because he wanted him to represent rationality. Without a name, and with very little biogrphical detail given (all we really know about the narrator is that he was a childhood friend of Roderick) we can assume that the narrator is objective. However, you could just as equally argue that since we don't know anything about the narrator, that he in fact isn't rational, and that what he sees/tells the reader isn't reliable. Some have suggested in fact, that the ending is just a figment of the imagination of an unreliable narrator. I believe the former, however, because there is nothing in the writing to lead one to believe that the narrator is anything but objective and reliable.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team