Why did the Civil War last so long?

The Civil War lasted so long for a number of reasons. First of all, the North had to conquer the South, which was no mean feat. The South arguably had better generals than the North, which gave the Confederacy an advantage over the Union.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The American Civil War lasted almost exactly four years, extending from the Confederacy’s firing on Fort Sumter in South Carolina on April 12, 1861 and ending with the South’s surrender on April 9, 1865. In between those dates were many bloody battles and enormous destruction of towns and countryside.

Why...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

The American Civil War lasted almost exactly four years, extending from the Confederacy’s firing on Fort Sumter in South Carolina on April 12, 1861 and ending with the South’s surrender on April 9, 1865. In between those dates were many bloody battles and enormous destruction of towns and countryside.

Why the Civil War lasted as long as it did is essentially an unanswerable question. History is replete with “what if?” moments and events, as war cannot be easily encapsulated in brief answers. Wars are not an abstraction; they are fought by human beings who are inherently fallible, and outcomes often hinge on imponderables such as weather or minute decisions regarding deployments of assets. If one wishes to understand why the Civil War lasted as long as it did, however, a good starting point could be President Abraham Lincoln’s exasperation with his commanding general, George McClellan.

Students of the Civil War are taught that an important advantage enjoyed by the Confederacy involved the number of skilled officers leading its army, led by General Robert E. Lee and including Generals Stonewall Jackson, J. E. B. Stuart, Nathan Bedford Forrest, and James Longstreet. These were, in fact, smart, capable leaders who did provide a marked advantage for the South. Facing them was General McClellan, Commander of the Army of the Potomac, with whom President Lincoln would prove to be enormously and infamously frustrated.

General McClellan was an extraordinarily cautious commander who, Lincoln believed, repeatedly failed to seize the initiative when it was available and repeatedly failed to capitalize on what successes he did enjoy. These frustrations were expressed by the president in his October 13, 1862 letter to General McClellan, the opening passage of which reads,

My dear Sir: You remember my speaking to you of what I called your over-cautiousness. Are you not over-cautious when you assume that you cannot do what the enemy is constantly doing? Should you not claim to be at least his equal in prowess, and act upon the claim? As I understand, you telegraphed General Halleck that you cannot subsist your army at Winchester unless the railroad from Harper's Ferry to that point be put in working order. But the enemy does now subsist his army at Winchester, at a distance nearly twice as great from railroad transportation as you would have to do without the railroad last named. He now wagons from Culpeper Court House, which is just about twice as far as you would have to do from Harper’s Ferry. He is certainly not more than half as well provided with wagons as you are. I certainly should be pleased for you to have the advantage of the railroad from Harper’s Ferry to Winchester, but it wastes all the remainder of autumn to give it to you, and in fact ignores the question of time, which cannot and must not be ignored.

This excerpt from President Lincoln’s letter was a precursor to his eventual firing of General McClellan and the latter’s replacement with General Ulysses S. Grant, whose temperament was decidedly less cautious than that of his predecessor. While McClellan had performed well in battles, his refusal to continue campaigns through to a more conclusive resolution could be considered a reason for the war’s prolongation. Whether this is fair can never be definitely determined, but there is reason to believe that Lincoln’s demands of a more forceful prosecution of the war than McClellan seemed willing or able to execute were well-founded.

That the war lasted as long as it did is more than a matter of concentrating on General McClellan’s shortcomings as a commander. The Confederacy represented a committed group of states united in their opposition to Lincoln’s determination to abolish slavery while preserving the Union. The Confederate Army was well led and fought bravely.

In the end, the North’s substantial advantages in material and wealth proved too difficult for the Confederacy to overcome. Southerners believed fervently that they were fighting to preserve a way of life, no matter that the Southern culture and economy remained contaminated by the crime of slavery. The South fought until it could do so no longer—an effort that required four long years to defeat.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

As with most wars, such as the First World War, for instance, most people instinctively believed that the American Civil War would be a short one. Sadly, they would be proved wrong as the war dragged on for four long years, causing death and suffering on an unprecedented scale.

One of the reasons for this was the fact that the North had to conquer the South, which was easier said than done. Upon the outbreak of war, the immediate aim of the North was to bring the South back into the Union by force. And the only way this could be achieved was by conquering the Confederacy.

This proved to be a difficult task for two main reasons. First of all, the South had arguably better generals than the North. Whereas the South had the decisive, daring General Lee, the North had to make do with the likes of Gegorge McClellan, a notorious vacillator who missed many opportunities in the field to inflict defeat upon the enemy.

The South enjoyed a further advantage over the North in that the Civil War was fought almost exclusively on its own territory. Inevitably, Southern generals had better local knowledge of the terrain on which most of the main battles of the war were fought and could press this home to their advantage.

Finally, the war lasted as long as it did because there was a much greater sense of common purpose among the Confederates. Southerners knew that they were fighting for a whole way of life and were thus able to put aside their differences in defending a common cause.

In the North, on the other hand, there was much more division. Not everyone was committed to fighting the Civil War; some were even sympathetic to the Southern cause and advocated appeasement. Many Northern Democrats, who were opposed to the Civil War, argued for a negotiated settlement that would allow the South to keep the institution of slavery intact.

Such divisions among the Northern ranks inevitably made it more difficult for the Union leadership to maintain a common sense of purpose and prosecute the war on the home front as effectively as they would've liked.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The Civil War lasted from 1861-1865. Many people thought it would be a shorter conflict. One reason why the Civil War lasted four years is that the South had better military generals than the North had. Many of the military schools were located in the South, and the generals tended to fight on the side that their home state had supported. For example, Robert E. Lee, who some people regarded as the best American general at that time, stated he would fight on the side that his home state of Virginia was supporting. Since Virginia joined the Confederacy, General Lee led the Confederate army.

President Lincoln had to replace some of his generals because they weren’t effective. For example, General McClellan hesitated to move his army at times. At Antietam in September 1862, he failed to pursue the retreating General Lee, possibly costing the Union a chance to end the Civil War at that time.

Another reason why the Civil War lasted four years is that the Union had to fully conquer the South. The South only had to fight a defensive war, but the North needed to completely defeat the South in order to win the Civil War.

There also was some opposition to the Civil War in the North. The Peace Democrats wanted President Lincoln to negotiate a settlement with the Confederacy. Thus, not everybody in the North fully supported the Union’s war efforts.

There are reasons why the Civil War lasted four years.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team