The Bet Questions and Answers
by Anton Chekhov

The Bet book cover
Start Your Free Trial

The Bet Summary

In "The Bet," who won the bet and who won the argument?

Between the Lawyer and the Banker.

Expert Answers info

marilynn07 eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2009

write469 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Science

I beg to differ.

I do think that the above answers are just as right as the one I am about to offer. But, I see it as though the banker actually was right. The young lawyer grew old far quicker than he would have if he had had the company of other people.

15 years in solitary confinement drove him to despise the 2 millions he was to be awarded if he lasted out the terms of the confinement.  His time in solitary drove him to despise human thinking, philosophy and all things "civilized".

The banker was right in that it was a death by degrees. The young lawyer entered his confinement young and energetic and left old and bitter at 40 years of age.

While morally, the young lawyer won the bet as he could have easily stayed another 5 hours, he lost the bet because he proved the banker right in that it was inhumane to be in solitary confinement for 15 years.

 

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Edith Sykes eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2007

write1,721 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Business

I think that the lawyer won the bet, he remained in the prison, as he said he would.  He accomplished his end of the bargain, while the banker, was left for 15 years to prepare to pay the money, and ends up in financial trouble, trying to find a way out of the bet.

In the fifteen years of confinement, the lawyer was left almost completely alone, except for the many books that he reads.  Through this process, he becomes wise and deeply spiritual about life.  He rejects material possessions, thereby refusing to take the money from the banker.

Instead of confinement stealing a man's life, the lawyer proved that confinement enriched a life, his own.

The banker has squandered his time, learning nothing about the value of life. He has not grown richer, either...

(The entire section contains 3 answers and 594 words.)

Unlock This Answer Now


check Approved by eNotes Editorial

luannw eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2004

write1,060 answers

starTop subjects are Literature and Math

Further Reading:

check Approved by eNotes Editorial


vkhan | Student

Interesting arguements, however I have to say, that the banker won. This isn't a question about moral at all, sure the lawyer stayed for 15 years, however, look at the begining of the story. The lawyer believed in life, he was joyful in a way. He took the bet for the money, the more wisdom he acquired, the more he started hating life, in the end, he became religious thinking that this life means nothing and that the afterlife means everything. He believes in the afterlife and not in life anymore. If a bet, makes you change and makes you become less then what you were or breaks your beliefs, then your opponent won.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial
undead24 | Student

I would say the lawyer one the argument because he proved that he can last in the solitary room for 15 years and care less about the money because he realized the money controled people and he did not wanna be apart of that he just wanted to be in his own little world being his own leader doing watever the hell he wants to do...Itz kind of Ironic how at first the banker tells the lawyer the bet is for five years in solitary confinement and the lawyer decided to take the stakes higher and go for fifteen years...In the end nobody really proved anything

check Approved by eNotes Editorial
fatima123 | Student

i think that the lawyer won...

 

 

check Approved by eNotes Editorial