Which you think was worse: life in the front lines or on the home front during WWI? Give reasons.

One could argue that life on the front line was worse during World War I because it carried with it the constant prospect of death or serious injury. Americans on the home front didn't have to endure such a prospect.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In just about all of the combatant countries that participated in World War I, life was much worse for those on the front line than on the home front. This doesn't mean, of course, that people living on the home front had an easy time; far from it, in fact. In countries such as Russia, for example, the civilian population had to endure chronic food shortages.

But on the whole, life was harder for those at the front, who had to live with the almost constant fear of death or serious injury. The First World War was like no other conflict in history. It was a particularly brutal, bloody war due largely to the deadly combination of trench warfare and the use of the latest military technology.

In the ensuing mechanized slaughter, just about any soldier could find himself killed or maimed for life. The constant fear of death hung over the trenches like the clouds of mustard gas that were unleashed by the enemy. No matter how bad things were at home, they were never as bad as this.

This was particularly the case in the United States, whose territory, unlike that of France and Belgium, was never part of the theater of conflict. As such, American citizens on the home front never experienced anything like the dangers encountered by US troops in Europe.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on
Soaring plane image

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial