If we examine the four choices, we can pick the right answer. As for 1, The Feminine Mystique does not argue that femininity should be tied to the ability to earn a wage and contribute to the family income. Women earning money is not Friedan's focus; instead, as she discusses...
See
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
If we examine the four choices, we can pick the right answer. As for 1, The Feminine Mystique does not argue that femininity should be tied to the ability to earn a wage and contribute to the family income. Women earning money is not Friedan's focus; instead, as she discusses in chapters 13 and 14, she hopes women will find fulfillment in meaningful work outside of the role of housewife and mother. Whether or not this work is paid is secondary to how fulfilling it is. (Many of the women Friedan interviewed were graduates of elite colleges like Smith and had married high-income men, so earning money was not an issue.)
Number 2 is also incorrect, as the book was a bestseller soon after it was published and attracted scholarly interest from the start. Option 3 is also wrong, as Friedan argued the opposite: She asserted that staying at home as full-time mothers was making women unhappy and having a bad effect on their children. She did say it might be a good idea for mothers of very young children to be at home—but only for a few years. That leaves number 4, which is the correct response. The book strongly questions post-World War II gender norms and argues that the traditional housewife role leaves many women unfulfilled.