Arthurian Legends

Start Free Trial

Where was King Arthur supposedly from?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The answer to this question depends upon if one believes King Arthur was a fictional character or not. Historians have argued, over many generations, if Arthur was real. Therefore, Arthur's origin depends upon if one believes in the fictional Arthur or the nonfictional Arthur.

If one only believes in the...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

The answer to this question depends upon if one believes King Arthur was a fictional character or not. Historians have argued, over many generations, if Arthur was real. Therefore, Arthur's origin depends upon if one believes in the fictional Arthur or the nonfictional Arthur.

If one only believes in the fictional Arthur, then he reigned as king of Camelot. According to literary and historical critics, Camelot was located somewhere in Britain (exact location is unknown). Other critics believe that Camelot is completely fictional and cannot be aligned with any geographical location.

On the other hand, if one believes that Arthur was real, then he most likely would have been from England (given some "Tudor monarchs traced their lineage to Arthur and used that connection as a justification for their reign").

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team