What are your criticisms of Diamond's themes, and how do you think societies could vary from some of he thematic paths that he suggests?I was wondering what you thoughts were....

Expert Answers
pohnpei397 eNotes educator| Certified Educator

The one thing that I really wonder about is how Diamond could account for the success of the Mongols.  Diamond's overall arguments seem to imply that the Mongols (as a non-agricultural society) should have had a hard time building a state and should not have had any real chance of defeating the Chinese and subjugating them for a long period of time.  Diamond tries to tie this to geography (the open plains where the Mongols did well) but he does not really get into this in any systematic way.

This makes me wonder if there might be other cases that would tend to disprove his theories but which I do not know about.

accessteacher eNotes educator| Certified Educator

A question that I am left with after reading this excellent book is if the factors that Diamond claimed resulted in certain nations starting the "race" on the starting line ahead of others have been erased thanks to globalisation and the ease of transport, what factors now can be used to determine which nations will get ahead of others? Firstly, I am not too sure that globalisation has erased all these factors, and secondly, I think this points towards the need for another book discussing the issue of dominance in our contemporary world.

litteacher8 eNotes educator| Certified Educator
I think that societies today have moved beyond our colonial days. We have entered a new era, where it is less about guns, germs and steel and more about communication and who controls information. Influence is still the main theme though, even today. Influence is now exerted through financial control.
Read the study guide:
Guns, Germs, and Steel

Access hundreds of thousands of answers with a free trial.

Start Free Trial
Ask a Question