What is wrong with the argument that since something has not been proven true, it must be false?

1 Answer | Add Yours

thanatassa's profile pic

thanatassa | College Teacher | (Level 1) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Imagine the statement:

  • "I think that a racoon got into my neighbor's garbage last night."

Assume I am making the statement based on the spilled garbage on her driveway, my knowledge of the behavior of racoons, and previous sightings of racoons in the neighborhood. However, I have not proved it to be true -- I did not catch the little furry bandit in flagrante delicto, as it were; thus the statement has not been proven true. There are other possibilities -- feral cats, dogs, coyotes, opossums, etc. On the other hand, the statement is not false merely because it is unproven. It is merely unknown, with a strong probability in favor of the racoon hypothesis.

Up until a few months ago, the Higgs boson was an unproven hypothesis, which like the putative racoon, seemed a probable explanation; now scientists have discovered it.

What's wrong with your argument is that many statements are probable or hypothetical rather than proven or unproven.

We’ve answered 319,859 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question