In what ways was Queen Elizabeth I better than the Stuart monarchs?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Queen Elizabeth I is considered by many to be the single most effective monarch of England, presiding over a golden age in both growth of economic and political power and of culture. In many practical ways, she was simply a more successful ruler than her Stuart successors.

The first element of her success was that she was unambiguously Protestant. The Pope was increasingly seen by the English, especially in the wake of the martyrdom of so many Prostestants under "bloody Mary", as a hostile foreign power attempting to overthrow the English government. The Stuarts' connections with Roman Catholicism were a major problem.

Next, Elizabeth was far more financially prudent than the Stuarts, keeping strict fiscal discipline when possible, and rarely asking Parliament for money. Next, she was more pragmatic in both diplomacy and religious policy, often succeeding by means of diplomacy and strategic negotiation. Finally, she was responsible for the defeat of the Spanish Armada, a momentous military victory for England, not equaled by any campaign of the Stuarts.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial