What was particular about the way Squealer spoke to the animals in Animal Farm?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

To understand Squealer's particularity in speech, one should understand his character and also his role and position within the context of the novel.

Firstly, as a pig, Squealer was in a privileged position after the Rebellion - he, just as much as the others of his ilk, took advantage...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

To understand Squealer's particularity in speech, one should understand his character and also his role and position within the context of the novel.

Firstly, as a pig, Squealer was in a privileged position after the Rebellion - he, just as much as the others of his ilk, took advantage when they were put in leadership positions. Obviously, once they had become accustomed to their new lifestyle, they had to protect it. In this, Squealer became the ideal tool to manipulate, mislead and deceive the other animals in order to propagate and defend their position. It is clear that he was ideally suited for this purpose as he had the skill and persuasive charm to persuade the other animals.

Orwell describes Squealer as follows:

The best known among them was a small fat pig named Squealer, with very round cheeks, twinkling eyes, nimble movements, and a shrill voice. He was a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white.

It is evident from the above that Squealer thoroughly enjoyed his duty as propagandist. The fact that he skipped from side to side whilst whisking his tail made him seem much more persuasive. It is clear that these actions do not only indicate his pleasure but are also used as a distraction. One should understand that, since the general animal populace on the farm are not very intelligent, they cannot be assumed to be the most attentive of listeners and would easily be drawn to Squealer's clearly visible actions than to what he is actually saying.

Added to that, Squealer purposely uses somewhat high-handed and especially emotive language when addressing the animals. The effect is that the animals would not question what he says since it sounds intelligent and reasonable. Evidence of this is found in his speech about the disappearing milk and the windfall apples:

“Comrades!” he cried. “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself. Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health. Milk and apples (this has been proved by Science, comrades) contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig. We pigs are brainworkers. The whole management and organisation of this farm depend on us. Day and night we are watching over your welfare. It is for YOUR sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples. Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back! Yes, Jones would come back! Surely, comrades,” cried Squealer almost pleadingly, skipping from side to side and whisking his tail, “surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones come back?”

Squealer uses specific persuasive language techniques: so-called factual evidence (Science); empathy (for YOUR sake); rhetorical questions - (You do not imagine...? Surely..? Do you know...?).

To add impact, Squealer adopts an almost pleading tone and uses his signature charming technique of 'skipping from side to side and whisking his tail.' With such a clever orator addressing them, the poor animals don't stand a chance. Squealer's voice goes practically unchallenged. He is only doubted and questioned by Boxer twice in the entire novel, but that is a different story.

 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team