Should George Milton be found guilty for his role in the death of Lennie Small in Of Mice and Men.Describe why George would be found guilty in John Steinbeck's novella Of Mice and Men.
In Of Mice and Men, I think George performs a "mercy killing," not murder, on Lennie, his long-time friend.
To convict on murder you need: 1) the act of murder and 2) an intent to kill which is intentional, purposeful, malicious, premeditated.
So, while George's mercy killing is intentional, purposeful, and premeditated, it is not malicious. The two men had not had a public fight; there's no signs of scuffle. George was a type of guardian to Lennie, and his role was that of protection.
According to California State Law, George may not be guilty of murder. There are exclusions, according to Voluntary Euthanasia Under the Law:
- Unlawful killings without malice or intent are considered manslaughter.
- Justified or accidental killings are considered homicides. Depending on the circumstances, these may or may not be considered criminal offenses.
So, I tend to think it is voluntary euthanasia, or manslaughter, or justifiable homicide and not murder, because there is no malicious motive on George's part. He knew that Curley and the posse were out for blood, and so he performed an act of mercy on his friend to prevent the inevitable.
Strictly by the law, George is clearly guilty of murder. He stole the gun, which clearly established what he had in mind to do when he went looking for Lennie. So he had a premeditated plan to kill someone and he carried it out. That is murder, possibly first degree murder.
Morally speaking, though, George did the right thing and is innocent. Curley and his men would surely have done much worse to Lennie. They would have killed him painfully and slowly. George, by contrast, killed him quickly and without Lennie knowing anything about it. So morally, George is not guilty.