What are some differences between the heroes in Elizabethan tragedies and Greek tragedies?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In Greek tragedy, a hero is carefully defined – falling from a high place, tragic flaw, catharsis, etc. – as defined and illustrated by Aristotle in The Poetics.  By Elizabethan times the term “tragedy” had become somewhat looser, describing a genre in which persons suffered various inequities (some of which – Macbeth and King Lear, for example – still fulfilled the Greek definition, and some which do not – Romeo and Juliet and Troilus and Cressida, for example).  These tragic heroes were more dramatic constructions to tell a story on the stage, rather than a quasi-religious icon of a philosophical world view.  Elizabethan heroes were more complex in their motives, in their psychological make-up, in their social standing, part of the "commodity" of theatre, rather than part of the ritual to honor Dionysus, as Greek tragedies were. Finally, the very term "hero" becomes rather ambiguous in Elizabethan drama, because whole societies were not necessarily affected, as kingdoms were in Greek tragedy.  

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial