What are several elements that make "The Most Dangerous Game" implausible?

1 Answer | Add Yours

bullgatortail's profile pic

bullgatortail | High School Teacher | (Level 1) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Aside from what seems the most obvious example--the hunting of humans as sport--I find most aspects of "The Most Dangerous Game" to be a wholly believable tale. Remember, the story was first published in 1924, so some of the events may seem impossible to believe in the 21st century. Examples might include:

  • A supposedly uninhabited island (especially in the well-travelled Caribbean) with a mansion hidden from view. Impossible today, but not at the time of the story.
  • The incredibly coincidental meeting of the two fanatical big-game hunters (but then that's what makes a good story--and such coincidences do happen).
  • The fact that no one ever investigated all of the shipwrecks that occurred off the island with the many missing men.
  • How did Zaroff continue to restock his exotic supplies of food and other luxuries without drawing attention to his secret island?

We’ve answered 318,911 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question