In Guns, Germs, and Steel, what responses by Diamond to Yali’s question surprised you?

Asked on by daisyrain

1 Answer | Add Yours

pohnpei397's profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

I will look here at two aspects of Diamond's response to Yali's question.

First, on the largest scale, I was surprised when I first read this book by the fact that he argues that culture had essentially nothing to do with which societies became powerful and which did not.  I grew up reading books that emphasized the importance of culture.  For example, in college I read Max Weber's argument about how the Protestant work ethic caused Protestant countries to be stronger economically than any others.  Therefore, to read a book that argued that culture had no impact was surprising.

Second, on the smaller scale, I was surprised and intrigued by Diamond's argument that the fragmented nature of Europe's geography and politics helped to make it stronger than places like, for example, China.  I had never considered the idea that having lots of relatively small countries would allow for more progress than having one large empire as in China.


We’ve answered 319,832 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question