The decision in the Terry case was applied in the case of Michigan v. Long. In this case, the standard of the police search in the Terry case was expanded to include motor vehicles.  In the Michigan v. Long case, the court ruled that the police were well within their rights to conduct a "Terry" search of the person of interest's car.  In this, the evidence gained from the search is not discarded as a violation of the 4th Amendment, but rather seen as being prudently obtained by perceptive police officers that sensed imminent danger being present.  The court used the Terry case as a precedent in that it enabled police to be proactive in their gathering of intelligence and evidence.  It is not unreasonable for police officers to recognize that there could be threats to public safety in the prelude to a commission of a crime or the denouement of one.  In this, the police officer's sense of perception and sensation enables them to conduct these searches that are not intrusive to the individual's sense of being, but rather is done in the name of public safety.  This is where the Terry case set a precedent for future jurisprudence.

What is another criminal procedure case that relies on the precedent set in Terry v. Ohio?

Another criminal procedure case that relies on the precedent set in Terry is Michigan v. Long.  In this case, the Court (among other things) extended the logic of Terry to allow for the search of a car based on reasonable suspicion.  In Long the Court ruled that it was legal to search the interior of a car so long as the police had a reasonable suspicion that a person in the car might gain access to a weapon that could be used against the police.  This followed the same logic by which "stop and frisk" was ruled to be legal in Terry.