3 Answers | Add Yours
I think that the largest criticism about watching television is going to result in the realities of children watching too much television. The negative values of passivity and an over-reliance on how complex problems are reduced to simple solutions on television might be two significant issues. In watching television, children learn passivity as a type of behavior. The idea of physical activity is significantly reduced with television watching and the dependence on it. This is not to say that children who watch television are passive, but rather watching too much of it can result in becoming passive and being averse to physical activity. At the same time, I think that the more dangerous effect of watching too much television is the belief that real life is similar to what is on the television. Corporate sponsorship and television executives control the "reality" that is presented on television, doing so with agendas that feed their own personal wishes. Children do not recognize this and might believe it as its own reality. This becomes problematic in addressing issues and challenges of the gap between real life and television's vision of it.
To me, there are two major negative values promoted by television.
First, there is the idea that violence, promiscuity, drug use and other negative behaviors are cool and acceptable. TV shows tend to show a great deal of these kinds of behaviors, often without showing any consequences of those behaviors. This is, for example, why TV is often said to cause kids to be more violent than they otherwise would be.
Second, TV promotes materialism. As people watch TV, they see people (in shows and especially in ads) enjoying lifestyles that are based on material possessions and which seem very attractive. Seeing this makes people want those things -- it helps make them define their lives in terms of what material possessions they have.
Brings together psychologists, sociologists, that the human being civil in nature, ie subject to influence general atmosphere of society, as it did in the tendency of a permanent contact group of course is configured to satisfy the needs of innate natural mountain of the human person, which generates the emergence of social systems Botrha various principles like the family and the economic system and the educational system etc. These systems in turn will determine the site of the individual from the community and its place positively or negatively, or so-called role (Role) At this point you are behavior problems float on the surface of social values that govern these roles gets what is called the (lack of social consensus Malad Justed) when it affects These social values kind of disorder in varying degrees and is called severe cases of deviation of social, bursting out individual frames set by the prevailing laws of the community in custom and morality and religion, a departure is not normal, and distinguishes psychologists, sociologists, this case from other cases of deviation-offs, including so-called ( Mental illness - Social), which is subject to the other to the interpretations and opinions and theories attempt to explain this problem once viewed and analyzed as a problem psychological sense, and the other removed the psychological aspect of her or gave him a small amount of overlap with the psychological dimension of the problem and whatever the views and propositions theory, they agree that the phenomenon of deviation is the main reason behind the tendency to crime and violence, so we'll see overlapping consensus in the psychological and social position of some social phenomena such as abnormal (violent behavior)
We’ve answered 319,419 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question