2 Answers | Add Yours
In "To a Mouse," by Burns, the most important linguistic device used--the device that contributed to a change in literature and a new movement in literature--is the Scottish dialect.
His use of common language for well-written, serious poetry--his poetry is serious, even when his subject is a mouse or a louse--is a rejection of neoclassicism, and ultimately helped pave the way to Romanticism.
Burns uses a regional Scottish dialect used only by a relatively few Scots, and thereby brought poetry to the common people. He rejected any view of poetry as elitist and only for the learned.
Along with the dialect, his subject is also common--a farmer in a field who cuts through a mouse's home. Yet he manages to deal with universal ideas--such as the futility of human intentions.
In this poem, the poet comes upon a little mouse while he is plowing his field. So, he employs a type of apostrophe - he addresses the mouse. The mouse is actually present, but obviously is not human and cannot understand the poet, so he also uses personification to attribute human qualities that the mouse does not possess. Then, there is a prolonged imagery in which the poet presents the mouse as a hard-working creature who must continually rebuild her house and who does not ask much from life - just a small ear of corn now and then. He then identifies with the mouse:
But Mouse, you are not alone,
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes of mice and men
Go often askew,
And leaves us nothing but grief and pain,
For promised joy!
He states that like the mouse, sometimes man's plans don't work out either (Steinbeck borrowed these lines for the title of his novel Of Mice and Men).
Finally, he concludes:
Still you are blest, compared with me!
The present only touches you:
But oh! I backward cast my eye,
On prospects dreary!
And forward, though I cannot see,
I guess and fear!
He says that the mouse is blest compared to man, for man must look back on his past with regret and man cannot see the future so he fears it, whereas the mouse is only concerned with the present.
Do you think these devices are effective? Does it make the poem come alive more by using a mouse as a vehicle to express such philosophical thoughts?
Read about Robert Burns here on eNotes.
We’ve answered 319,816 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question