What is the moral of A Tale of Two Cities, and how are the two cities significant?

The moral of A Tale of Two Cities is that experience and tradition provide greater stability than revolutionary uprisings. The former is represented by London, the capital of Britain, and the latter is represented by Paris, the capital of Revolutionary France.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In many ways, Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities can be seen as a political parable. Great Britain in the late eighteenth century is presented largely as the epitome of political stability, enjoying as it does the benefits of a political system based on experience and tradition. France, on the other hand, is given to us as a country mired in chaos on account of a revolution which, though it may have been motivated by the best of intentions, has degenerated into violence, terror, and bloodshed.

To be sure, Dickens is much too good of a writer to allow his chauvinism to be too one-dimensional. The English legal system certainly isn't presented in the best light during the sedition trial of Charles Darnay. Even so, the evident deficiencies of the English criminal justice system are as nothing compared to the terror of the Revolutionary Tribunal and its cruel dispatch of innocent people to the guillotine.

By comparison with Paris, London is depicted as a relative haven of peace and tranquility. The Manettes have been able to set up home in the British capital after the release of Dr. Manette from the Bastille. Although Dr. Manette was a victim of the Ancien Régime and not the revolutionary authorities, the message is clear: France lacks the political stability enjoyed by Great Britain, not least because it lacks the long-standing tradition of liberty enjoyed by successive generations of Englishmen.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on January 12, 2021
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The introduction to the moral of A Tale of Two Cities begins with the opening lines: 

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way."

The moral of the book is that there is duality in the world.  Where there is light, there is also darkness.  Right and wrong have very much to do with who writes the history and what the situation looks like when the blood hits the ground.  Because of this duality, it is important to be wary of whom you trust and causes for which you fight.  

The book deals with both London and Paris from 1775 forward.  For both England and France, this was a time of revolution.  England (King George III) was experiencing the beginnings of the American Revolutionary War and likewise Louis XVI is dealing with the social unrest of the people in France.  Both George and Louis are alike in their reactions to the situation (that they cannot understand why their sovereignty is being questioned); however, the results of the revolutions are polar opposites.  England emerges from the American Revolution with minimal damage, almost stronger than they were before, while France is fractured socially, morally, and the government is in shambles.    

Dickens’s points out the differences between London and Paris.  England is focused on ghosts and psychics while France is fixated on the religious leaders in order to evade torture and death. He also compares France and England, concerning their justice systems.  France's harsh justice system is mirrored with England's relatively relaxed system.  England finds itself overrun with bandits and rioting prisoners with very little consistency and order in the judicial system.  France on the other hand is strictly ruled through the new justice system the people demanded.  While they claimed that it would be impartial and better than the system before, instead it is the polar opposite.  Dickens does however, point out that even though England’s court system does have its flaws, it is far more stable than France’s justice system and does produce fair rulings.

In the end, the moral of the story is that a person must be responsible for their own choices, the people they trust, and the actions that they take.  Because of the duality that exists in the world, the only truth is in who you are and what you do, yourself.  Everything else is susceptible to corruption.  Because of the duality that exists even in yourself, it is important to weigh and be responsible for your actions.      

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Charles Dickens wrote A Tale of Two Cities as a warning to the ruling powers of England.  The message was that the French Revolution was caused by social inequality and serious unrest.  At the time the book was written, it was already historical fiction.  Dickens was making it clear that the causes of the French Revolution were present in Victorian England.  In Dickens’s day, there were also many poor and disenfranchised people that were treated badly.  Dickens championed programs to educate and care for the poor, and wanted to abolish discriminatory practices such as the Poor Law.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
Soaring plane image

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial