T. S. Eliot was one of the leading voices of Modernism and was close to the center of its complex web of reciprocal influences. At the beginning of his career, Eliot often took advice from the poet who is often regarded as having done more than anyone to articulate what...
See
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
T. S. Eliot was one of the leading voices of Modernism and was close to the center of its complex web of reciprocal influences. At the beginning of his career, Eliot often took advice from the poet who is often regarded as having done more than anyone to articulate what Modernism meant: Ezra Pound. Many books have been written on the meaning of Modernism, but at its very most basic, the type of Modernism espoused by Pound and Eliot can be described as a literary reaction against both the horrors of modernity and the poetic style of the Victorians, which was felt to be quite inadequate to describe the twentieth century.
Pound often commented on Eliot's early drafts and advised him on what he ought to cut in order to make the poem more purely Modernist. It is interesting to look at one passage that survived Pound's censorship, as an illustration of the direction in which he was trying to push Eliot, and in which Eliot later went. These lines are close to the end of "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock."
No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;Am an attendant lord, one that will doTo swell a progress, start a scene or two,Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool,Deferential, glad to be of use,Politic, cautious, and meticulous;Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—Almost, at times, the Fool.