What is the author's purpose in writing "The Lottery"?

Shirley Jackson's purpose in writing "The Lottery" was to show ordinary people in small-town America committing an evil act without any malevolent motive, or even any motive at all. When the story was first published, shortly after the Second World War, many Americans believed that the atrocities committed in Nazi Germany could never have happened in the USA. Jackson gives a plausible account of how such events might have occurred.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Shirley Jackson's purpose in writing "The Lottery" has confused many readers. In 1948, when the story was first published, The New Yorker (where it was first printed) did not distinguish between fiction and journalism; there are various accounts of readers mistaking the story for a news report...

See
This Answer Now

Start your subscription to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your Subscription

Shirley Jackson's purpose in writing "The Lottery" has confused many readers. In 1948, when the story was first published, The New Yorker (where it was first printed) did not distinguish between fiction and journalism; there are various accounts of readers mistaking the story for a news report and demanding to know where in America this hideous annual ritual was taking place. For most readers, however, the problem with the story has been the exact opposite. Since there is no town in America where the residents are ritually stoned to death, why bother to condemn the practise? Isn't it superfluous to point out that it would be terrible if people were to do such a thing?

The purpose of the story is revealed in the leisurely, tranquil build-up to the ritual act of violence. Jackson continually emphasizes that these are normal people in a typical, even stereotypical small town. They are not particularly malevolent, merely hidebound and unimaginative. The story was written shortly after the Second World War at a time when many people argued that Hitler could never have risen to power in America. Americans believed that there must be something wrong with the German people to allow them to see and support such evil. Jackson shows that, given certain circumstances, ordinary people can do horrendous things. Collectively, we are particularly susceptible if it is a tradition, and even more so the evil act is regarded as socially acceptable.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

It is always difficult to know exactly what an author meant to do or what idea(s) they meant to convey with a particular text. unless we actually have a record of them saying so themselves. Beyond knowing authorial intent, we have to work to figure out what a text actually does accomplish.

This particular story seems to convey a few, related ideas. Namely, we human beings have a very hard time dealing with change. We tend to avoid it whenever we can. Next, we often hold on to outdated, sometimes cruel traditions or standards because they are familiar and they are what we've always done. Because they are what we've always believed, we are loathe to let them go.

Many characters seem to exemplify this theme of clinging to cruel traditions. Certainly, Old Man Warner seems to be just such a person. He gets downright angry when he hears talk of other towns doing away with the lottery, though it serves no real purpose, and he's even irritated by the casual demeanor of Mr. Summers. Mr. Summers has proposed making a new box to use for the lottery since the current one is cracked and splintered and the paint is chipped. In response to this progressive bent, the narrator says, "no one liked to upset even as much tradition as was represented by the black box." Not even the visual symbols of the lottery can be challenged.

Though there seems to be some vague notion connecting the lottery to the growth of crops, that certainly is a superstition to which most people no longer adhere. Thus, the brutality of the lottery is only enacted because it always has been, at least as far back as folks can remember. It is dangerous, we see, to hold on to traditions for their own sake. We must learn to analyze our behavior and change, or we will do irreparable harm to ourselves and others.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on