What happens when people only know history through creative works of art and not from primary sources and facts?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

First of all, we should note that works of art can be considered primary sources.  However, your question is still a valid one.  If we know history only through the creative arts we can misinterpret what things were like in a given time and place.  We can do so by taking the creative work too seriously as a representation of the opinions of the people of its time and place.

For example, if we were to try to understand the antebellum North only through Uncle Tom's Cabin, we might misunderstand that time.  We might think that all Northerners were very much opposed to slavery.  We would be wrong because we would be equating Harriet Beecher Stowe's ideas with those of all the people of that society.  Therefore, we need more purely historical sources to help us put the works of art into perspective.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial