What features of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot question theatrical conventions?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Waiting for Godot is an absurdist play, and because of this, it defies theatrical conventions in numerous ways. The play is more of a philosophical exercise in the idea of futility and human existence than anything else. The first way that it defies convention is that there really is no...

See
This Answer Now

Start your subscription to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your Subscription

Waiting for Godot is an absurdist play, and because of this, it defies theatrical conventions in numerous ways. The play is more of a philosophical exercise in the idea of futility and human existence than anything else. The first way that it defies convention is that there really is no legitimate plot. The main characters are waiting: the entire play is about them waiting and discussing if they should move on. But the titular Godot never arrives, and the plot never moves on. In fact, other characters come through and mention events that may have occurred or might happen in the future if only the characters would leave their post, but the characters never depart and never initiate the plot.

Additionally, the setting is essentially a void and meaningless place; the only sign of a setting is a lonesome tree near which the men encamp. In fact, even the time of the setting seems rather dubious. It is in evening, but there is not much else said to describe it, and each subsequent day passes exactly as the previous one has: waiting for the never-seen Godot.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The previous educator is right to point out that Waiting for Godot contains very little in terms of plot. Events and character development do not drive this play but rather the interchange of words and ideas between the characters. Another powerful example of the play flouting theatrical convention lies in the setting. Plays typically use clues in the dialogue and props on stage to convey the time period and/or location of the story. Beckett provides the audience with no such guidance. An audience member (or reader) is unable to orient themselves in the setting—the time and place—of the play. All that exists to set the scene at the onset of the play are the following stage directions:

A country road. A tree.

Evening.

These scant descriptions leave us with more questions than answers. What year, what country, what world is this? Beckett intentionally deprives us of this context to emphasize the existential themes of the play. In terms of theatre, the play's deliberate lack of setting and contextualization certainly questions the theatrical convention of framing a play within a readily identifiable time and place.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Though it is a landmark theatrical experience, nothing much really "happens" in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot. The play includes a lot of talking, interacting pairs of characters, and references to God, suicide, and more, and yet little (if anything at all) is actually accomplished by the time the curtain falls. Thus, the play rebels against theatrical traditions by eschewing plot, meaningful character development, and other realistic context. Instead, the play meditates on the nature of the human condition, ultimately positing that humanity's attempt to wrestle "meaning" out of life might be misguided. As such, though the lack of theatrical convention in the play might be initially jarring, it ultimately serves an important purpose. Just as the play questions the traditions that give theatrical productions meaning, it also questions the traditions and conventions that have historically grounded humanity in any definition of meaning.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Samuel Beckett's play, Waiting for Godot, violates traditional theatrical conventions in several ways. First, it has no realistic setting, but only an abstract tree on an otherwise empty stage. It has no plot. The story doesn't progress and every day is a repeat of an earlier one -- Godot never will arrive. The dialogue is not realistic, and in the case of Lucky's "thinking" is incoherent. The characters are outside of time, place and history. Unlike in convention drama, we do not get a sense of teh characters having motivations -- or rather, in the play, everything is so absurd that actions are done out of ossified habit rather than purpose, because the normal causal relations underlying purpose have frayed.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team