What exactly does the soldier mean by discribing war as "quaint" and "curious" in Thomas Hardy's poem "The Man He Killed?"I am asking both literally and figuratively. It seems odd to explain his...
What exactly does the soldier mean by discribing war as "quaint" and "curious" in Thomas Hardy's poem "The Man He Killed?"
I am asking both literally and figuratively. It seems odd to explain his revelation of war being illogical with the word quaint - meaning attractively old-fashioned or pleasantly strange in an interesting way. I kind of understand the word curious, but I don't understand how it relates to the word quaint.
Thomas Hardy is a British writer, and in British English, the word "curious" is more likely to be used to express "strangeness" or "oddness," instead of "the state of wanting to know more," as is the most common American English connotation. In the poem "The Man He Killed," the tone of the words "quaint" and "curious" is light, and conveys a sense of bemusement more than shock. This is all in keeping with the writer's purpose; his intention is to communicate the complete absurdity of the concept of war by approaching it with a matter-of-fact attitude of mild amazement. The contrast between the exceedingly grim reality of his subject matter in the poem and his own quiet wonderment in reflecting on it creates a vivid sense of irony, and it is through this ironic tone that the writer conveys his message. In war, you unquestioningly "shoot a man down" whom, had you met him in other circumstances, you might have been great friends with, and if you really think about it, this situation is completely absurd. The fact that the speaker uses such mild terms when considering this completely tragic phenomenon only accentuates the disconnect.
the relation between 'quaint' and 'curious' has been well explained in the Post#1. Thomas Hardy might have used these words in an ironical manner. Soldiers from teo different countries, guarding their territory, during peace time sit together, dine and enjoy wine together and even share money. When war begins not for their enemity but for some political or other reasons; they stand in either side and shoot at each other and get killed. If we make a contrast of both the situations, its curious and quaint.