What are the ethical differences between "good" and "bad" knights in Morte d'Arthur?

Expert Answers info

John Newell, J.D. eNotes educator | Certified Educator

briefcaseLawyer

bookB.A. from University of Nevada-Reno

bookM.A. from Rice University

bookJ.D. from McGeorge School of Law


calendarEducator since 2016

write100 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Law and Politics, and History

On the surface, the difference between "good" knights and "bad" knights in Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur depends on those knights' adherence to the chivalrous code, the code of ethical behavior that a knight errant was supposed to follow. Knights errant were, ideally, knights that traveled the countryside looking to perform chivalrous acts. In general, the knights of the Round Table were supposed to be knights errant.

Knights errant stood in contrast to knights who sought personal glory or gain from their actions. Such knights fought for their own purposes and did not follow the chivalrous code. Sometimes these "bad" knights were knights that were fighting...

(The entire section contains 346 words.)

Unlock This Answer Now


check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Ask a Question