Ferdinand de Saussure

Start Free Trial

What are the differences between Saussure and Bloomfield?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Bloomfield came from the Neogrammarian school of linguistics.  That means he focused on the historical aspects and evolution of languages.  He studied particular languages, their history and how words are generated.  Both Bloomfield and Saussure studied language as a structure or with a scientific basis.  The main difference is that Bloomfield studied linguistics diachronically: it's historical and comparative development.  Saussure studied language synchronically: he made the comparison between language and chess.  You don't need to know the history/previous moves; you could understand the system just by looking at the board at any single moment/state.  This is the synchronic.  Unlike Bloomfield who studied the historical development of linguistics, focusing on behavior, Saussure sought to understand the underlying structure of language in general: and this had to do with the relationship between signs.  Bloomfield's study would focus more on this history of signs.  I think you could say that Saussure's study is more abstract (still scientific) and philosophical and Bloomfield's was more sociological and a little psychological.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial Team