What is the difference between refutation and counter argument?

2 Answers | Add Yours

mwestwood's profile pic

mwestwood | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

A counter argument is the consideration of an opposing position of one's thesis, or contention. Its purpose is to anticipate opposing points and pre-empt them. In a persuasive essay, the counter argument is part of a refutation paragraph; however sometimes it comes in the introduction.

In a refutation paragraph, which is sometimes called a concession paragraph, the writer acknowledges valid points of an opposing viewpoint. In this paragraph, the writer then refutes these points with stronger points in a counter argument. Then, there is a conclusion, or summary, of why the writer's points are stronger than those of the opposing argument.

It is usually a good idea to first strive to establish common ground for one's argument, and then acknowledge opposing viewpoints in the refutation paragraph and respond to them with counter arguments.

Sources:
thanatassa's profile pic

thanatassa | College Teacher | (Level 3) Educator Emeritus

Posted on

My own sense is that the terms often overlap and that the differences are often fairly subtle.

One difference is that "refutation" signals an agonistic form of argument where "counterargument" can signal more cooperative forms of argument. Imagine that two people are arguing over legalization of marijuana. A debate might go:

A: I don't want my kids taking drugs. Therefore we should keep marijuana illegal to keep our kids safe from it.

B: It's easy to refute that by looking at some facts about marijuana use.

C: I agree with your concern about keeping our kids safe and preventing them from abusing drugs. On the issue of whether keeping marijuana illegal helps with that, there is a counterargument that criminalization hasn't been effective.

While B is offering a refutation, saying that A is simply wrong, C is suggesting that there are arguments and counterarguments we need to consider and that it isn't a simple and clear cut issue. C's approach is more likely to be convincing and effective because it doesn't treat A like an idiot but acknowledges the validity of some of A's concerns. 

The term "counterargument" normally refers to a single argument that contradicts another single argument but a refutation can argue against a larger work consisting of many parts. You might refute Creationism by offering a counterargument against a specific way in which a creationist dates fossils.

Finally, in classical rhetoric, a counterargument is a logical structure and a refutation is fourth of the six parts of an oration, coming between the confirmation and the peroration. 

Sources:

We’ve answered 318,949 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question