What is the difference between a proportional representation and winner-take all-system?
I understand that the P.R is for a more fair version of system but i dont get how splitting it up is really different from the winner take all system other than there is only a 51% to nothing in the WTA system. Im sorry if im not expressing myself very well, i tend to have a hard time with that.
The difference between these two is that, in a winner take all system, a party that does not win the plurality of the votes does not get any representation. In a proportional representation system, a party can get representation even if it does not win the election.
Let us imagine that three parties run in an election. One gets 50%, one gets 30%, and one gets 20% of the vote. In a WTA system, only the first party gets represented. This is not proportional. In a PR system, the parties would get representatives in proportion to the votes they got. If there were 10 representatives, the first party would get 5, the second party 3, and the third party 2. This is why many people feel this sort of system is fairer than a WTA system.