What comparisons can be made about what we know about the Miller and Mak from The Second Shepherd's Play?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Both men are part of the working class. Mak steals sheep from the other shepherds (considered a bad enough offense to get one hanged during the middle ages) and tries to mess with other people for his own amusement. The Miller is also mischievous, knowingly following up the Knight's courtly...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

Both men are part of the working class. Mak steals sheep from the other shepherds (considered a bad enough offense to get one hanged during the middle ages) and tries to mess with other people for his own amusement. The Miller is also mischievous, knowingly following up the Knight's courtly tale with a sex farce (complete with fart jokes). So both are trickster

However, the two men are presented different physically. The Miller is physically powerful and well-built. He likes wrestling and it is implied he is quite virile. He is a huge man. Mak is not described in such detail as Chaucer gives but he is wily and easily overpowered by the other shepherds when they discover his deceitful actions.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team