Raleigh's "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd" is a response to Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love." Both involve a debate between a "shepherd"—a young man—and a "nymph"—the woman he is in love with. In Marlowe's poem, the shepherd tries to persuade the nymph to come away with him and live a pastoral life. In Raleigh's poem, the nymph makes her response to the shepherd.
The poems are both written in iambic tetrameter and consist of six quatrains with a regular scheme: abab in Marlowe and rhyming couplets in Raleigh. Raleigh also uses Marlowe's imagery, speaking of roses, posies, and coral clasps. Both deal centrally with pastoral mythology—the idea of the escape to a simple life in the country as an idyllic response to the pressures of sophisticated urban life.
The poems differ in that Marlowe's shepherd focuses wholly on the imagined perfections of a simple life in nature with his beloved. In his poem, the world lives in an eternal spring and summer, life is full of "Melodious birds" and beds of roses, and happy shepherd swains sing and dance in May.
In Raleigh's more ironic and realistic poem, the nymph punctures the dream by pointing out the realities that flowers fades, winter comes, and young lovers age, while roses and posies "wither." There is no perfect place of eternal spring and eternal youth. The practical nymph is unwilling to leave the security of civilization for the imagined dream of what critic Raymond Williams calls the "enameled" world of the pastoral.
The most obvious point of both comparison and contrast between these two works is that Christopher Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" is an invitation while Sir Walter Raleigh's "The Nymph's Rely to the Shepherd" is an answer to the proposal. By their very nature, then, they are both connected and nothing alike. While they both clearly reference some of the same images, both poems have different functions: one poses a question and one answers it.
Another obvious point of contrast for these poems is the speaker's tone--as well as the speakers themselves. Marlowe's speaker is a young shepherd who wants the woman he loves to marry him; Marlowe's speaker is that young woman who gives the shepherd her answer. The tone of the "passionate shepherd" is hopeful and romantic; he offers this woman everything he has which is of value (to him, anyway) and promises her a life of pastoral luxury. The tone of the "reply" is, well, not as romantic.
The shepherd highlights some things he hopes will move this woman to marry him, including these:
And I will make thee beds of RosesAnd a thousand fragrant posies,A cap of flowers, and a kirtleEmbroidered all with leaves of Myrtle;
A gown made of the finest woolWhich from our pretty Lambs we pull;Fair lined slippers for the cold,With buckles of the purest gold;
A belt of straw and Ivy buds,With Coral clasps and...
See
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
Amber studs:
Thy gowns, thy shoes, thy beds of Roses,Thy cap, thy kirtle, and thy posiesSoon break, soon wither, soon forgotten:In folly ripe, in reason rotten.Thy belt of straw and Ivy buds,The Coral clasps and amber studs,All these in me no means can moveTo come to thee and be thy love.
On the other hand, the two poems are quite similar because the "reply" is a mirror, or perhaps an older, wiser echo of the proposal poem. Notice the two quotes from the poem, above, in which the nymph repeats all of the things he said he will give her. This is true for everything in the shepherd's poem. If he mentions sitting on a rock, the reply also mentions it; if he mentions listening to madrigals, so does she. This is really the one thing they have in common, and it is quite significant. There is no mistaking that "Reply" is connected to and a direct response to "Passionate Shepherd."
Despite their containing most of the same elements, it is the tone which most sets these two poems apart. One reflects the innocence and hopefulness of young love while the other expresses the more cynical view that shepherds do not always tell the truth and that seasons will inevitably change.
Compare the personas of the two poems: "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" by Marlowe and "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd" by Sir Walter Raleigh.
In Marlowe's poem the shepherd is the protagonist. He is the one who attempts to persuade his lover to come away with him for a life of Edenic rural bliss. In Raleigh's rejoinder, however, the roles are reversed. Now it is the nymph's turn to point out the practical flaws in the shepherd's elaborate scheme. For one thing, the swain is mortal, while the nymph immortal. No matter how pretty the shepherd and the natural world may be at this precise moment, in due course they will both fade and decay. As an immortal, the nymph can spend all eternity surrounded by beauty that will never die. So all things considered, the shepherd's generous offer doesn't really amount to all that much.
The object of the shepherd's love and affection is a passive character. We never get to know anything about her, or find out what she wants out of a relationship. Raleigh's nymph, on the other hand, is an assertive character, leaving the hapless swain in little doubt as to what she wants out of life. (Or more accurately speaking, eternity.)
Compare the personas of the two poems: "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" by Marlowe and "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd" by Sir Walter Raleigh.
And I will make thee beds of RosesAnd a thousand fragrant posies,A cap of flowers, and a kirtleEmbroidered all with leaves of Myrtle
Thy gowns, thy shoes, thy beds of Roses,Thy cap, thy kirtle, and thy posiesSoon break, soon wither, soon forgotten
Compare and contrast the subject of love in Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" and Raleigh's "The Nymph's Reply to Shepherd."
I agree with #2, though there is an undertone of haughtiness to the Nymph's reply. A rustic shepherd offers all he has, and the response is, of course, no. What he offers physically is fleeting, it's true, but she dismisses his love as fleeting, as well. Though he does not mention love or marriage, he does offer everything he has, and she will have none of it. I don't blame her for wanting something more permanent, though.
Compare and contrast the subject of love in Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" and Raleigh's "The Nymph's Reply to Shepherd."
The passionate shepherd is a pastoral poem with a bit of the carpe diem of the age in it. He says to the young lady, if you like fair weather, simple gifts from nature (beds of flowers, skirts, wool shoes, coral clasps, etc.), then come live with me and be my love. This is a sieze the moment poem where he appeals to the girl's sense of living in the present and going for the temporary pleasures that the scenery, sheep, and his attentions in the spring and summer sun can afford her. He never mentions marriage or long-term love.
The nypmh's reply capitalizes on this. She says, if you could promise that it would last forever...if the summer would be here all year around and your love would never die...then I would be moved. BUT all the things you mention are temporary with no hint of permanent conviction or commitment. Shepherds have "honey tongues" and none of this will last, so why should I come be your love? I can get sweet talk right here where I am, thank you very much. She's not buying what he's trying to sell.