The main difference between Victorian and Modernist literature is the shift towards questioning the omniscient narrator. There was a shift from an objective (all knowing) to a subjective (provisional) narrative form.
Victorians used the godlike, all-knowing narrator largely without thinking about it. Even writers who told a story from one character's point of view would break in with wisdom from on high. (The best source for a detailed explication of this difference between Victorianism and modernism is Erich Auerbach's final essay, "The Brown Stocking," in his book Mimesis.)
The modernists found the omniscient narrator—the backbone of the "realist" novel—unrealistic. A writer like Woolf, for example, was an early questioner of what today we would call 'man-'splaining.' She, of course, didn't have that term, but she questioned the authority with which male writers would make assertions about women. As a woman, she felt these authoritative assertions were distortions of reality: they...
(The entire section contains 4 answers and 1067 words.)
Unlock This Answer Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.